Started By
Message
How do you explain that reversal?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:32 pm
Actual scandal in the Miami game
3
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:33 pm to jamespatterson
He controlled it to the ground.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:33 pm to lewis and herschel
He sure did. Was lying on his back when the ball got ripped out.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:35 pm to jamespatterson
Considering Miami barely beat the team that lost to Vanderbilt, Miami will be ranked #12 come Monday, right?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:36 pm to Emmanuel Goldstein
That reversal may be the reason an SEC team is kept out of the playoffs.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:36 pm to lewis and herschel
quote:
He controlled it to the ground
Not even close.
It was the right call by review officials.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:38 pm to 1putt
Ball never touched the ground.....It could only be a td or interception
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:41 pm to volinknox
i think they ruled the miami DB out of bounds when he came up with it
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:41 pm to Warwick
The db didn’t have the ball
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:42 pm to jamespatterson
quote:
How do you explain that reversal?
Acc offices need 2 CFB relevant football teams
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:47 pm to volinknox
Its incomplete if intercepted out of bounds which is what I think happened. It was still chicken shite of the refs not to give a better explanation.
I am not a big fan of overturned calls without obvious evidence but between getting out of Miami alive and the obvious preferred political decision, there was zero way that call was standing.
I am not a big fan of overturned calls without obvious evidence but between getting out of Miami alive and the obvious preferred political decision, there was zero way that call was standing.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:49 pm to GeauxTigers1410
Looked like the VT receiver got to the ground with the ball in control and it was ripped out after he was down. Regardless, there wasn't evidence to reverse the call.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:50 pm to jamespatterson
Yes, taking 5 minutes to review confirms they should have let it stand.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:51 pm to jamespatterson
I agree there was not enough evidence.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:51 pm to lewis and herschel
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm to Dawg4Life47
quote:
The db didn’t have the ball
what was he carrying when he got up and ran off?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:55 pm to jamespatterson
quote:
Looked like the VT receiver got to the ground with the ball in control and it was ripped out after he was down. Regardless, there wasn't evidence to reverse the call.
If you call it a TD, there has to be clear evidence that it wasn't.
In this situation, there was no clear evidence.
VT won the game.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:56 pm to Chip82
Just wait and watch how a more deserving team is bumped from the playoffs because of this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News