Favorite team:Missouri 
Location:Wildwood, MO
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:251
Registered on:9/17/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Wednesday SEC Basketball

Posted by Miz-Stl on 2/12/25 at 11:40 pm
Hey OU guy you better hope that Ford is an idiot or your school might not dance. The Sooners just got blasted by what Ford says is an 8th seed. I think Florida, Ole Miss, Kansas, and Miss St. might differ with him, but maybe not.

re: Pat Adams is in the bag for Mizzou

Posted by Miz-Stl on 1/14/25 at 10:58 pm
You have to be kidding me, the refs were so one-sided for the Gators it was ridiculous. I feel like the Tigers just beat two teams, Florida and the refs.

re: Congrats Mizzou

Posted by Miz-Stl on 1/14/25 at 10:56 pm
It's basketball season. Go away.
I can't believe a Gator fan had the sack to complain about the refereeing. The game was called very one-sided for Florida.
It seems every year this topic comes up, kick Mizzou out. As a Mizzou fan I could care less; we're in, deal with it.
Mizzou winning made the SEC 5-3 in the postseason and the Big Ten 4-3 in the postseason. Definitely going to be rooting for Boise St. tomorrow night.

re: Oklahoma 20 @ Navy 21 Final - ESPN

Posted by Miz-Stl on 12/27/24 at 10:50 pm
Wow Arky fans sure chirp a lot. The only thing I know about their school is that it gives Mizzou an auto win in its last regular season football game every year. Thanks for the win donation pig fans.
No question OU has for the most part owned Mizzou in the past. That being said a new day is dawning for them. Nebraska thought they walked on water too until they switched conferences, and the SEC is a hell of a lot harder than the Big 10.
I hate Texas because they ruin conferences. And they are haughty as hell for no reason. They occasionally raise their head up and win something but most of the time they are mediocre at best. For all their resources they big time underachieve and aren't smart enough to know it.
You would think that with all of the Texas money and the popularity of football in their home state that the Shorthorns would be a football power year in and year out. For some reason it never happens. I can't wait for them to be an annual 8-4 team in the SEC. They aren't Bama or Georgia, they just think they are.
I love that OU is coming to the SEC but did the conference have to let the trailer park trash of the Big 12 come in with them?
When Mizzou arrived in the SEC over a decade ago I thought the SEC was overrated. I based that on September results and Bowl games, and probably a little Big 12 bias. What I didn't realize until Mizzou played a few seasons in the SEC is that the SEC is tougher for two big reasons. One, the talent level is much higher. All you have to to do is look at the NFL draft and recruiting rankings to know the SEC talent level is higher than the rest of the country. The second is how fanatical SEC fans are. Yes Texas and Oklahoma are great programs; however in the Big 12 they rarely line up against teams with their talent level and their fan base support. In the SEC that is called a fall Saturday. The grind of playing against the high level talent and playing in places with such rabid fans is a gauntlet. I found many of what I thought were good metrics are misleading. September football is not a good indicator because many teams are still figuring out who they are. Mizzou only beat Middle Tennessee by 4 this year yet went 6-2 in the SEC. If Mizzou had played Middle Tennessee in October I believe they would have crushed them. Bowls are a bad indicator because who knows what players show up and how motivated a team is. No, the only way to understand the SEC is to play a SEC schedule. In 2024 OU and Texas get to find out. Good luck!
Hard to see Oklahoma doing much better than 4-4 in the conference next year.

Probable losses: Alabama, At LSU
Really tough games: Texas (only not probable loss because rivalry game), At Ole Miss, At Mizzou, Tennessee, At Auburn
Only relatively easy game: South Carolina.

Even if Mizzou and Ole Miss take a step back next year, it is just as likely Tennessee and Auburn rebound. Maybe even South Carolina rebounds.

As Texas got a relatively easy transition schedule, who did OU piss off? Or conversely who did Texas pay off?

re: Talking about SEC expansion

Posted by Miz-Stl on 11/28/23 at 11:03 pm
Not sure why the SEC would want to lower its standards and let in Kansas. The only reasoning I can see is to give Vanderbilt an auto-win in football every year.

re: Cap tip to Missouri

Posted by Miz-Stl on 11/12/23 at 9:31 pm
Georgia Beat them 60-0 and instead of kneeing it when under a minute left run another one in to make it 67-0. Yeah Vols, Mizzou fans remember. Was glad to see your coach try to kick a meaningless field goal just to make the score look better, and then have Drink ice your kicker. What a loser thing to attempt. Also pretty much a punk move for your D lineman to run into our QB as he was kneeling to end the game. What a classless and pathetic team you root for Vols fans. Very glad the Tigers handed your team a real butt whopping and I hope the Bulldogs hand you even a worse one Saturday. Heupel is a classless clown. Go Dogs! P.S. I thought your team was the third best Tennessee team Mizzou played this year. I guess you can celebrate that you get the bronze medal ahead of Vandy.

re: Does the vote have to be 11-3

Posted by Miz-Stl on 7/21/21 at 8:03 pm
In answer to why Mizzou would vote no: because Texas screwing up the Big 12 is one of the reasons the Tigers left the conference. In the SEC, Alabama may rule on the field, but for the most part it appears all the schools have a say in its direction. In the original Big 12 before the four teams left, Texas treated the conference like its own private fiefdom. I know many SEC fans wish that Mizzou wasn't let in, but at least our school doesn't cause trouble. Texas is a virus and you don't let viruses into your system.

Ole Miss band was rude

Posted by Miz-Stl on 10/13/19 at 10:17 am
Since Mizzou joined the SEC every team but LSU has played at Faurot Field. In that time I have been impressed with the passion and classiness of the SEC fanbases. Last night for the first time I was not impressed. Mizzou has a tradition of playing the Missouri Waltz and the Mizzou fans standing up for the song. For whatever reason the Ole Miss band decided to perform a song during the entire playing of the Missouri Waltz. I get bands trying to outplay each other during most of the game; however normally visiting bands do try and respect other teams' traditions. I have been going to games at Mizzou since the 70s and only one other band from the Big 8 then Big 12 and now SEC has pulled the stunt of playing over a Mizzou tradition. That has included games against some very hated rivals, and even those teams, even including the hated Jayhawks, have respected our musical traditions. The only other team not to, the stuck up trailer park trash Texas fans. Note to Ole Miss, not good company to be associated with.

re: What type of team is Mizzou?

Posted by Miz-Stl on 9/22/19 at 3:34 pm
boXerrumble, in answer to your original question, I think Mizzou this year is a team that can hang with any team in the East except Georgia. Since they have been in the SEC, most years they seem to play well or above themselves against Florida and Tennessee, get owned most years by South Carolina and Kentucky, and do about what other teams at their level do against Georgia and Vandy.

They got past one of their normal stumbling blocks yesterday.

I agree with an earlier post, if they get past Kentucky then I think it is quite possible their only conference loss will be against Georgia. For whatever reason they seem to always be tough on the Gators even when they aren't as good. With this year being in Columbia, and in November when Odom tends to have his teams playing well, I would be nervous about that game if I was a Gator fan.

re: Big12 speed

Posted by Miz-Stl on 12/28/18 at 10:28 pm
To Boomer00, the recruiting rankings I was quoting were this years. If Mizzou was in the B12 right now their class which was ranked 31st would have been 4th in the B12. I was not trying to discuss past rankings when they were actually in the B12. My point was the current SEC is far more talented than the current B12.

re: Big12 speed

Posted by Miz-Stl on 12/28/18 at 2:45 pm
Mizzou would be 4th in recruiting in the B12 (and if transfers were accounted for probably 3rd). Mizzou is 13th in the SEC. OU would be 5th in the SEC. Mizzou 31st and Vandy 46th are lowest in SEC. B12 has teams in 70s and even one in 90s. Alabama wins in conference were virtually all against top 25 talent level teams, OU's wins included only one team in the top 25 of recruiting. The point is there is a BIG difference in talent between the B12 and SEC. The Boomer Sooners are about to find that out the hard way.