Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Baton Rouge
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:14455
Registered on:12/15/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/14/25 at 2:19 pm
quote:

that’s a horrible way to go


it would be except that's not how he went

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/14/25 at 1:31 pm
quote:

Who is the person that posted it?


Wendy Murphy

quote:

I'm honestly so done with hearing about what people think happened


I know Officer John O'Keefe was not hit by a vehicle.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/14/25 at 12:59 pm
Here a Twitter lawyers explanation of what happened to OJO.





The person that posted this may have ties to the prosecutors office. Will this be the Commonwealths theory for trial 2?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/14/25 at 6:42 am
quote:

Well it gave me other information as well, but this is the likely injuries.


The commonwealth only claims that Officer John O'Keefe was hit on the arm. So some of those injuries aren't expected, but how many of those injuries did OJO receive?

Then ask ChatGPT what kind of injuries are expected after someone is beat up, and compare those injuries to OJO's injuries.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/13/25 at 9:05 pm
quote:

They were saying he fell down after he was hit right?


After flying some distance yes he ended up falling down.

quote:

It just seems like the wounds wouldn't be as specific as they are if he was hit. It seems like there would be some brush burns somewhere on his body.


I would say the injuries would be much more specific if he was hit by a vehicle. They injuries would be focused at the point of impact. Such as broken bones in his arm, bruises on his arm, or maybe even a dislocated shoulder is he was only hit on the arm.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/13/25 at 8:27 pm
I recently rewatched Dr. Stonebridge’s testimony. She has all the answers!

It’s a bit confusing why the defense didn’t cross Dr. Stonebridge.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/8/25 at 9:47 am
quote:

This all happened during a blizzard so he was probably wearing a thick jacket, right?


He was wearing a hoodie.

quote:

How can he sustain such arm injuries, from being hit by a car that's backing up at 24 mph, if he was wearing a thick jacket? Wouldn't the jacket have cuts from the plastic that cut his arm?


ding ding ding

the sleeve of the hoodie has punctures (single holes) on the sleeve. Pictures were shown during the voir dire of Dr. Russell. She described how the fibers around the punctures in the hoodie were directed away\outward from the sleeve. She testified that showed something punctured the sleeve then was pulled out.

re: Scott Martin just quit BASS

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/5/25 at 11:31 pm
quote:

No one is interested in watching guys stare at screens all day


What does low turnout at the weigh in have to do with guys staring at screens?

re: Rifle Build Questions

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/5/25 at 8:37 am
Hawkins SA DBM bottom metal and pair it with AI mags (no binder plate). That’s what i used in my rifle build.

MidwayUSA

Mile High Shooting Supply

If you get the short action.

quote:

Assuming any medium action doesn't share a footprint of the short or long variants. So then do you severely limit stock options?


Yes you want every thing to match. Short action or medium action depending on which action you choose. I know Foundation makes medium action stocks and I think more companies are starting to make medium action components.

re: Tennessee Pitching..

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/5/25 at 7:45 am
quote:

A&Ms is the worst batting team in the SEC by a pretty decent margin.


It’s very clear that schloss was the person behind the offensive approach. A&M hitters with schloss were always hard out. They would grind out every at bat and foul pitches off. Now that is Texas and A&M is just hacking at everything.

But again the players wanted earley.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/4/25 at 10:01 am
I'm also 100% certain that she is being framed. If I put myself in her shoes and was being framed for a murder I didn't commit I probably wouldn't be the nicest person in interviews.

That is also why they probably shouldn't have let her do these interviews for the documentary. Seems like they didn't consider that 1st trial could come back hung and they would be starting a new trail right when the documentary was airing.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/4/25 at 9:03 am
quote:

I'm curious as to why you say this if you haven't watch the doc.


Because everyone it seems a large percentage of people that say they only watched the documentary say some form of KR is not a good person, she probably did it, but it can’t be proven.

If you are doing a real unbiased documentary on this case the ARCCA testimony should be at the center of the entire thing. That testimony is completely exculpatory and proves that the pedestrian strike did not happen.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 11:59 pm
quote:

It proves she didn’t back into him the way the state claims


So if she didn’t back into him at 24mph how did the taillight material end up on the yard all around him?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 11:52 pm
quote:

They said there was no way she backed into him, knocked him out of shoes, and he flew 30 feet.


Essentially. That didn’t go to proving she didn’t back into OJO?

Or did was that part of what lead you to reasonable doubt?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 11:48 pm
quote:

You lost me with that one. If they covered it, I missed it.


Well that would pretty insightful to the purpose of this series if they didn’t cover the ARCCA experts.

ARCCA is an engineering firm that does work for the NHL, US military and others. They are experts in how injuries occur and how to prevent injuries. They were hired by the U.S. attorney office to determine if the injuries to OJO and damage to the Lexus were consistent with a pedestrian strike.

Their finding was that based on the injuries to OJO and damage to the Lexus and pedestrian strike did not happen.

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 11:37 pm
quote:

I just didn’t see anything in the documentary that proved she was innocent


What was the coverage of the ARCCA experts like in the documentary? How much where they covered and how?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 11:15 pm
I think you might have misunderstood one of my previous post. I was trying to see why you can’t get to innocent?

Is it because you haven’t put much thought into innocence because the state didn’t failed to get past reasonable doubt? Or is it because there is something about the case that makes you think maybe she did hit him with her car I just have reasonable doubt that she didn’t hit him?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 10:46 pm
quote:

I found her to be repulsive


So she is possibly guilty because she is “repulsive” and if Proctor didn’t send some text messages you might find her guilty?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 10:19 pm
quote:

She has the presumption of innocence. So that’s all you need.


So you never got past reasonable doubt to find that she was guilty and just didn’t put any more thought into her possible innocence?

quote:

I did watch the HBO series. Unless it is highly edited, the state just doesn’t have a case.


I have not watched the HBO series and probably won’t as it seems it is a hit piece.

What does the series have in it regarding the ARCCA experts?

re: Karen Read murder trial

Posted by civiltiger07 on 4/3/25 at 10:07 pm
quote:

I don’t know if she’s innocent.


What keeps you from getting to innocent?