Favorite team:Missouri 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:82
Registered on:6/2/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Does anyone care about Mizzou?

Posted by NewZou on 5/28/24 at 5:45 pm
quote:

Mizzou had mediocre talent on defense


Mizzou just had 5 guys from the defense drafted, including one in the 1st and 2nd round. It has plenty of talent.

re: There are 9 mega bluebloods in CFB

Posted by NewZou on 4/21/24 at 10:10 pm
The 8 blue bloods of CFB are pretty obvious
Alabama
USC
Notre Dame
Michigan
OSU
Nebraska
Texas
Oklahoma

Everyone else is behind them. The team closest to falling off from their blueblood status is Nebraska, but even then they're at least a decade or two of consistently terrible performance before that can be considered.

re: Mizzou and Drinkwitz on the clock

Posted by NewZou on 4/11/24 at 1:22 am
Drop the link then if it's real. Everyone seems so confident it's real but no one is dropping a link to anything. I think you're just talking outta your arse like the rest of braindead twitter
Nope, Carlies just announced he's coming back for next year. I expect STAR will be Carnell; Charleston and Carlies will start at safety next year, and, hopefully, Burks will be the first guy off the bench.
Ironic considering the first CFP ever was won by third string QB Cardale Jones. There’s 0% chance an undefeated Power 5 champion like 13-0 FSU gets left out. Zero chance.

The 4th seed would go down to 12-1 Alabama and 12-1 Texas, and I imagine you have to take Texas over Alabama due to the away win at Alabama. Kind of like how Cincinnati got the 4 seed over Notre Dame a couple years ago. SEC would be screwed out of the playoffs.
SEC shorts have definitely diminished in quality this year unfortunately. Roll Call has been killing it this year. And I agree, the fact that all the teams are included in Roll Call every week is something I really appreciate and think it's something SEC Shorts is really lacking in.
The SEC being nice to Mizzou for once? We'll see how long it lasts :lol: appreciate it

re: 2025 Football Recruiting

Posted by NewZou on 9/17/23 at 1:37 am
The St. Thomas Aquinas pipeline (but the Kansas version this time) continues!

re: SEC POTW: Week 2

Posted by NewZou on 9/11/23 at 12:15 pm
Still not quite sure why Mizzou didn't accept Jeffcoat back for one more season. Or why SCAR dropped as a transfer him during the offseason.

re: teams weakness going into the season

Posted by NewZou on 8/25/23 at 7:17 pm
TE is way worse than QB, that position is so bad its basically an afterthought. If I had to rank the worse units for Mizzou going into the season I'd say it's:

1. Tight Ends
2. Defensive Ends
3. Running Back (I like Cody Schrader but he is not a starting SEC quality RB)
4. Offensive Line

I'd say Mizzou's WR & DT rooms are the two strengths of the team as far as talent, and particularly depth, goes.
He only ranked the SOS for teams ranked in the AP top 25, which South Carolina is not.
With Eli’s most talented team yet, I got Mizzou going 8-4.
Texas-OU
Tennessee-Vanderbilt
Georgia-Florida
Ole Miss-Mississippi State
Alabama-Auburn
LSU vs Texas A&M
Mizzou vs Arkansas
Kentucky vs South Carolina

There’s the list

re: The real candidates for Expansion

Posted by NewZou on 6/20/23 at 8:25 pm
Yeah I never really understood why the SEC would want Clemson and FSU when we already have the state’s flagship schools of SCAR and UF. Virginia and UNC would be great fits considering they’re flagship schools in southern states the SEC doesn’t have any schools in. Just makes too much sense to want them instead of FSU and Clemson.
Mizzou and kansas to the Big Ten would be a great move for everyone involved. Mizzou is closer culturally to the Big Ten than the SEC, and I say that as someone who was born and raised in the most culturally southern part of Missouri. It give us a natural rival with Illinois and Nebraska as well. Plus I could finally quit hearing everyone bitch about us on here.
And your mother is one stroke short of being a vegetable, but it don’t mean crap until it happens.
So instead of playing all the other teams 10 times in 20 years, it’d be reduced to playing them 8.33 times in 20 years.

Total number of games against Team A = 5 games per year x 20 years = 100 games

Number of teams excluding Team A and its 3 permanent rivals = 12 teams

Again, each team plays Team A an equal number of times, so we divide the total number of games against Team A by the number of remaining teams:

100 games / 12 teams = 8.33 games
8 teams play Team A 8 times in 20 years
4 teams play Team A 9 times in 20 years

That’s up to the school and AD’s, all I can do is guess. SI sports thinks it’ll be something like this

Missouri: Oklahoma, Arkansas, Vanderbilt

Arkansas: Missouri, Texas, Ole Miss

Texas A&M: LSU, Texas Mississippi State

Texas: Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Arkansas

Oklahoma: Texas, Missouri, Florida

LSU: Ole Miss, Texas A&M, Alabama

Ole Miss: Mississippi State, LSU, Arkansas

Mississippi State: Ole Miss, Kentucky, Texas A&M

Alabama: Auburn, Tennessee, LSU

Auburn: Alabama, Georgia, Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt: Tennessee, Auburn, Missouri

Tennessee: Vanderbilt, Alabama, South Carolina

Kentucky: Mississippi State, South Carolina, Georgia

Georgia: Auburn, Florida, Kentucky

Florida: Georgia, South Carolina, Oklahoma

South Carolina: Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky

If there are any games you think that could be switched that all teams would approve of let me know.
It hasn’t really been discussed but I don’t know why, I think it’d be better tradition wise to do a 3-5-5. Yeah you wouldn’t play all the SEC teams every other year, but you’d still play them more often than we do now while maintaining traditional rivalries, which should be the priority.
So, under this scheduling plan, teams would play their alternate teams five times every 12 years while still preserving three rivalries. It seems like the most optimal approach, especially if the SEC intends to stick with an 8-game schedule. Thoughts?