Well, the reality has been for 100 years that college football has been a sport where 2 losses and you out. And if you were a fan or alum of any team outside the usual top 15 or so one loss and you were eliminated. That’s why the majority of fans embrace a big playoff. It takes away the bias.

chinhoyang•1 day

Bias? The bias against teams that cannot win.

Show 1 last reply in this conversation

ChatGPT of LA•3 days

Of course a weak coach with a weak team in a weak conference will say he wants more in

TheWalrus•2 days

Bert is fat

Timeoday•3 days

How about a 12 team double elimination tournament and fuhgedaboudit?

Dawgs2122•19 hours

Go to 32. Then have another NIT style 32 team tournament so schools like Auburn and the Vols can play too!

NorthGwinnettTiger•1 day

That fat frick has aged like spoiled milk.

scrybe•2 days

Whether it's absurd or not, you shouldn't be editorializing in a news headline.

FliesByNight•2 days

Teams play two regular season games and then it goes into a 126 team playoff with single elimination. You work all year for the season and it can be over in a few weeks.

Datbayoubengal•2 days

I like the 12 number. The problem we have is people pretending the G5 has a reason to have an autobid because of the stupid "5 highest ranked conference champs". If you remove that angle, ND makes it and IMO, I would put Texas in over BYU. Texas would have played Oregon in Eugene, and ND would have come to Oxford. Are yall seriously telling me those aren't extremely more compelling and competitive games? If they ever do raise it, 16 should be the final stop. That would have added Vandy, BYU, USC, and Utah.

TigerDean•3 days

16 the Least ... 20 the Most

Bret Bielema Needs to Produce Better Teams.. And so does the big 10

Ponchy Tiger•3 days

This no more absurd than 24.

Popular Stories