Started By
Message
PAC 12 laughing at SEC teams?
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:01 am
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:01 am
LINK
quote:
Pac-12 has 7-5 disease
By Ted Miller | Nov 28, 2012 7:35 PM
Arizona, Arizona State, USC and Washington fans: Go here. Soak it up. Take in the glory of Mississippi State.
(At this point, we'd encourage Mississippi State fans to turn away. Just as we are supposed to love the sinner but hate the sin, we love you but not your schedule).
The Bulldogs' best win this year was over Middle Tennessee, a team that lost to McNeese State. Its four SEC wins came against teams that went a combined 14-34.
Arizona, you beat Oklahoma State, Washington and USC. Arizona State, you beat Arizona. USC, you beat Arizona State and Washington. Washington, you beat Stanford and Oregon State. Heck, Arizona's win over Toledo and Washington's over San Diego State are better than anything Mississippi State did this year.
Each of you, I suspect, would pound Mississippi State. The Bulldogs, bless their hearts, aren't very good.
Ah, but the Bulldogs are 8-4. So many college football fans -- and media members -- look at their eight wins and your seven and say, "Mississippi State is better than Arizona, Arizona State, USC and Washington."
This is a ramification of having 7-5 disease, which some years is also known as 6-6 disease.
What's the big deal? Well, Mississippi State is probably going to go to the Franklin American Mortgage Music City Bowl where it will play an NC State team that just fired its coach, according to our friends with ESPN.com's SEC and ACC blogs. The Bulldogs should prevail -- NC State is, after all, the ACC's only bowl-eligible 7-5 team -- and load up a ninth victory.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:02 am to Whereisomaha
More like laughing at MSU. We laugh at MSU also
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:03 am to Whereisomaha
ISWYDT
Strong work.
Strong work.
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 12:04 am
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:04 am to Whereisomaha
They wrong. Ole Miss will be in Nashville for the Music City Bowl.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:05 am to CNB
Poor grinders. Worst 8-4 team in the land.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:05 am to Whereisomaha
everything that post says is a valid opinion.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:06 am to Whereisomaha
Didn't we hang 48 on Washington? Poor PAC 12 idiots.
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 12:06 am
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:10 am to memphisplaya
quote:
Didn't we hang 48 on Washington? Poor PAC 12 idiots.
wtf how did you hang 48 on anyone. Your offense was pathetic. Still better than our shite show but you sure as hell couldn't do that to our shitty defense.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:12 am to Whereisomaha
Mizzou was a bottom tier SEC team this year that beat ASU.
The butthurt is obvious.
The butthurt is obvious.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:13 am to oklahogjr
quote:
wtf how did you hang 48 on anyone
Pac-12 "defense" lmao
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 12:14 am
Posted on 11/30/12 at 5:39 am to Whereisomaha
I guess I am lost on the point here. State was no better than the 7th best SEC team and realistically lower than that and yet they still took care of business in the games they were supposed to, even if they got hammered against the big boys plus Ole Miss. Is every team in the SEC supposed to have a legit argument they could win if we had a NC playof? I mean is 6 teams not enough?
The Pac 12 was filled with a lot of middling teams that knocked each other off and the better teams that had trouble closing. That is supposed to be a good thing?
If you really want to understand the strength of the SEC all you have to do is realize how fast Auburn and Arkie fell and how fast. It's an unmerciful league.
The Pac 12 was filled with a lot of middling teams that knocked each other off and the better teams that had trouble closing. That is supposed to be a good thing?
If you really want to understand the strength of the SEC all you have to do is realize how fast Auburn and Arkie fell and how fast. It's an unmerciful league.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 6:08 am to aggressor
Vandy is 8-4. Wonder why they singled out MissSt?
Posted on 11/30/12 at 6:10 am to troywew
They singled out State because they had to go 8 or 9 deep in the SEC to find a school to fit their argument.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 6:24 am to TH03
Hopefully state loses their bowl game and finishes out their season 1-5.
The article is correct. State had a crappy schedule.
The article is correct. State had a crappy schedule.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 7:25 am to Whereisomaha
When did all this hate for winning football games come about? I mean...you won the game. IS it your fault your competition isn't any good? Should the team just roll over and let one of them beat them just to prove their strength of schedule? I mean wtf are teams supposed to do? Not win? To ridicule a team for winning games it is supposed to not only makes the person look super stupid, but coming from a PAC 12 homer, its downright laughable.
Posted on 11/30/12 at 7:31 am to Mr. Elvert
quote:
Poor grinders. Worst 8-4 team in the land.
As a Mississippi State fan/alum who endured multiple 3 win seasons while I was a student. I don't give a flying frick what PAC-12 teams or any rantards think about our win.
An 8 win season at Mississippi State is a damn good season period. We have the lowest budget and least to work with of any team in the SEC.
Hats of to coach Mullen and his staff for leading us to our 3rd straight bowl.
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 7:32 am
Posted on 11/30/12 at 7:36 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
PAC 12 laughing at SEC teams?
More like laughing at MSU.
Not to worry though, we are laughing at all of them.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News