Started By
Message
Why is Texas considered a blue blood program in football
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:57 pm
And lsu is not ?
41
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:58 pm to LSUbacchus81
Because LSU is poor.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:59 pm to LSUbacchus81
Money
Posted on 3/27/25 at 5:59 pm to AlterEd
Makes the most sense I suppose
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:03 pm to LSUbacchus81
Because they're one of the all-time winningest teams of all time?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:04 pm to theGarnetWay
Better than the all time winningest team of part time I reckon.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:04 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Better than the all time winningest team of part time I reckon.
Do you know how many wins Team Redundancy team has?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:22 pm to LSUbacchus81
But is it?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:25 pm to LSUbacchus81
LSU was completely irrelevant in CFB prior to Saban
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:29 pm to AlterEd
They are poor white trash
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:31 pm to LSUbacchus81
Is Texas considered a blue blood or like the CFB version of the Hall of Really Really Good? They are but couldn’t resist the troll. If we’re counting since the year 2000 then LSU would be but history isn’t on their side long term.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:32 pm to LSUbacchus81
Link: Blue Blood Interactive Chart
A good example in a different sport is UConn in Basketball. They aren't a traditional blue blood, but they do have 6 titles now, so I think it's a valid question to wonder if/when/how that changes..
I honestly don't know, but it doesn't mean anything about today or going forward, but it is a term that describes the past..
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:33 pm to LSUbacchus81
-138 more wins
-Twice as many conference championships
-22 more consensus All-Americans
I'm not saying it's right, these just point to a longer history of overall success.
-Twice as many conference championships
-22 more consensus All-Americans
I'm not saying it's right, these just point to a longer history of overall success.
This post was edited on 3/27/25 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:34 pm to Lolathon234
quote:
LSU was completely irrelevant in CFB prior to Saban
Texas was just as irrelevant before Mack Brown going back to Darrell Royal. They literally made a living being Barry Switzer's bitch.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:34 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Because they're one of the all-time winningest teams of all time?
I thought it was strictly based on national championships. They both have 4.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:35 pm to Clark14
quote:
Money
Money has bought Texas one national championship the last 54 years. Holy shite.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:35 pm to LSUbacchus81
CFB blue bloods were minted in the 20th century. LSU is new money.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:35 pm to LSUbacchus81
Travel ball vs blue bloods
Which topic is more suicidal?
Which topic is more suicidal?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:36 pm to ElChupacabra
quote:
138 more wins
-Twice as many conference championships
-22 more consensus All-Americans
all moral victories.
LSU 3 NC and should be 4 since 2003 without a mulligan.
Texas 1 NC in the last 54 years. 1971-2025
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:36 pm to Lolathon234
quote:
LSU was completely irrelevant in CFB prior to Saban
I wouldn’t go that far. It’s funny to me yall have been this ‘dominant force’ for decades and were only able to muster up 4 titles. Like LSU.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News