Started By
Message
Why should a player be given a limit on eligibility at the college level?
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:19 am
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:19 am
They’re pros now….telling them they can only play a certain amount of time is unconstitutional****
This post was edited on 12/20/24 at 1:20 am
3
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:26 am to themetalreb
U can't be serious
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:28 am to themetalreb
With NIL, I really hope they eliminate redshirt and go back to 4. Screw paying a kid to train him.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 1:29 am to ImayGoLesMiles
I’m not, (note the sarcastrics in the OP), but it’s coming anyway.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:31 am to Dallaswho
quote:
With NIL, I really hope they eliminate redshirt and go back to 4. Screw paying a kid to train him.
That idea is terrible but they should definitely only be paid for playing
Posted on 12/20/24 at 5:54 am to TN Tygah
It's time to rein the BS in. Make them sit a year when they transfer. Sure portal on out get paid. Go to school. Use a redshirt. But you sit.
Posted on 12/20/24 at 6:07 am to themetalreb
quote:
They’re pros now….telling them they can only play a certain amount of time is unconstitutional****
so I was curious about this too. The NCAA is losing every battle in court....badly. Id imagine that eligibility is going to be challenged. First as some kid who wants a 6th year, and then just someone challenging eligibility at all since they are employees... I in no way want that, but I do think it is coming
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News