Started By
Message
Texas’ record since 2010
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:33 pm
103-74, a 58% winning percentage (impressive, but certainly not up to par with the Texas brand), and 25-14 since Sarkisian took the reins. Last year was good for Texas, no doubt, but unfortunately they pulled a Bama against a 3rd year HC from the PAC 12.
But the SEC is far weaker than the mighty Big 12; gentlemen, this may be the breakout season they’ve been waiting for. Arch Manning is also so good that it’s been rumored he can occasionally “will his team to win” from the bench.
Perhaps a 2005 season is on the horizon, or maybe even a return to the glory days we’ve all read about in history books, but to this day those have not been confirmed to have ever happened.
I just wanted to point this out because it doesn’t seem like Texas fans around here have the slightest clue as to how the rest of the NCAA sees them.
Serious responses only. Not a troll thread, please.
Discuss.
But the SEC is far weaker than the mighty Big 12; gentlemen, this may be the breakout season they’ve been waiting for. Arch Manning is also so good that it’s been rumored he can occasionally “will his team to win” from the bench.
Perhaps a 2005 season is on the horizon, or maybe even a return to the glory days we’ve all read about in history books, but to this day those have not been confirmed to have ever happened.
I just wanted to point this out because it doesn’t seem like Texas fans around here have the slightest clue as to how the rest of the NCAA sees them.
Serious responses only. Not a troll thread, please.
Discuss.
This post was edited on 7/9/24 at 11:33 pm
16
Posted on 7/9/24 at 11:40 pm to TN Tygah
Is this thread a response to LSU not being a Blue Blood?
Posted on 7/10/24 at 12:50 am to TN Tygah
Something something…cherry picking the last 14 years…something something
Posted on 7/10/24 at 1:40 am to TN Tygah
alas the "glory days" and awesome record against Aggies tua is so proud of was accrued before scholarship limits were imposed in 1973.
the tua record against Aggies including 1973 and later seasons is 20-19.
the tua record against Aggies including 1973 and later seasons is 20-19.
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 1:45 am
Posted on 7/10/24 at 2:31 am to TN Tygah
Until they prove otherwise, 58% winning
Percentage IS their brand lol.
Percentage IS their brand lol.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 5:36 am to TexasOnTop
quote:
Is this thread a response to LSU not being a Blue Blood?
LSU Football:
806-434(.645)
4 National Championships
31-24 Bowl Record
3 Heisman Winners
Texas Football
948-382(.702)- This has a lot to do with the Big12
4 National Championships
31-25 Bowl Record
2 Heisman Winners
If Texas is considered a blue blood so should LSU.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 5:40 am to DhanTigers212
quote:
Texas is considered a blue blood so should LSU.
Naw. LSU is new oilfield trash money. Texas is 5th generation rancher money.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 5:58 am to Dairy Sanders
Imagine not winning a championship in one of the big 3 sports since 2005.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:18 am to DhanTigers212
Bama destroyed them in 09..see Miami after Bama destroyed them in 92 nat
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:20 am to TexasOnTop
quote:
Is this thread a response to LSU not being a Blue Blood?
hhmmm, lets see
blue blood
or
3 trophys this century
pick one sport…
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:31 am to DhanTigers212
Not about success dumdum...it's about being old...since 1930s continued success...
Miami Hurricanes not blue but what 4 5 Nats 80s early 90s
Miami Hurricanes not blue but what 4 5 Nats 80s early 90s
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:37 am to TN Tygah
All facts
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:39 am to TN Tygah
Sorry but what relevance do Charlie Strong and Tom Herman results have to do with projecting Texas’ performance going forward?
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:50 am to TN Tygah
quote:You wanted to start yet another thread about Texas because this entire board is completely obsessed with us. Incessant, repeated threads, day after day after day, about Texas.
I just wanted to point this out because
quote:
it doesn’t seem like Texas fans around here have the slightest clue as to how the rest of the NCAA sees them.
We absolutely do have the slightest clue how the rest of the NCAA sees us. Every time some pundit makes a list of blue bloods, Texas is on it and you are not. That's how the rest of the NCAA sees us, but more importantly, that's how the rest of the NCAA does NOT see you. It sucks that you're so butthurt about it, but that's just the way it is.
See you on the next Texas thread in an hour or so.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 6:57 am to rtr23242526
quote:
Not about success dumdum...it's about being old...since 1930s continued success...
But Utrans didn’t win a championship until the 1960s, And they only have three
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 6:58 am
Posted on 7/10/24 at 7:01 am to TN Tygah
They did beat UGA in the Sugar Bowl.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 7:01 am to Dairy Sanders
quote:
Naw. LSU is new oilfield trash money. Texas is 5th generation rancher money.
More like 5th generation rancher who went into the oil business, became a billionaire, and now employs the LSU oilfield trash money...but I get your point.
One is a real school in a real state. The other is a mediocre school in a state with absolutely nothing else going on.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 7:41 am to DhanTigers212
Blue Blood = Won nattys when the #1 ranking was decided BEFORE THE BOWL GAMES - pre-1970s...
Pre-1970s Natty's are mostly suspect AF...Blue Blood status is pretty much a fraud case-by-case.
LSU and the U are by all means New Blue Bloods...
Pre-1970s Natty's are mostly suspect AF...Blue Blood status is pretty much a fraud case-by-case.
LSU and the U are by all means New Blue Bloods...
Posted on 7/10/24 at 7:49 am to TexasOnTop
quote:
TexasOnTop
You know you are a bottom
Posted on 7/10/24 at 7:49 am to Longhorn Actual
You forgot you suck weiner.
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News