Favorite team:USA 
Location:Twin Lakes, CO
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:35688
Registered on:1/3/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Colorado Trip Ideas

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 7:14 pm
:lol: Lowlanders and "altitude sickness" ...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 5:23 pm
Go read the history of Venus. Im using the example of it launching an assload of water vapor and it causing a runaway heat up. Not that it wasnt already hot for a myriad of reasons. [quote]Venus is really hot because the atmospheric pressure is 1350 psi, i.e. adiabatic compression.[/quote] ...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 4:29 pm
[quote]can I get this info form a psychometric chart?[/quote] If I wasnt busy, Id pull it for you. Sorry. I think you'll be surprised how little is there. Can get up to 4%, so not nothing. On average globally, its more like 0.5%. ...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 4:25 pm
[quote]That's why I referred to water as that great capacitor. It is a damper in a spring, mass, damper system.[/quote] Its not overall but I understand where youre coming from bc yes, it tempers the climate in a location. Overall though, you end up holding more energy in that the clouds bloc...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 4:19 pm
[quote]Energy per unit time or temperature per unit time.[/quote] Lets stick with energy, its more clear what the discussion is really about. I also dont f'n know the exact numbers. There would be an increase of the flux out that would end up leading to a lower energy equilibrium. ...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 4:11 pm
[quote]The point is, it takes a lot more energy to heat and cool an atmosphere filled with water vapor than without.[/quote] Concentrations matter. The water vapor concentration is pretty damn small, even when "humid". Run the math, it doesnt make a shits worth of difference bc N and O ar...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 4:06 pm
[quote]Then I have to ask, what is the rate of energy dissipation for CO2 compared to other atmospheric constituents?[/quote] What context exactly are you asking? In the framework Im trying to explain, this energy would slowly leech back into space until we got to our new equilibrium from the...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 3:48 pm
[quote]It means lower highs and higher lows (temps). [/quote] Lower highs bc it rains out baw or at least clouds up. But this is one of the biggest questions in the modeling, what does an increase in cloud cover and cloud type mean for the incoming energy flux? The nighttime bit... it works ...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 3:45 pm
[quote]The IR frequency is close to the natural frequency of the CO2 molecule. It does not deflect. It absorbs and subsequently vibrates which is a description of temp.[/quote] It absorbs, vibrates, and sends the energy back off reverting to its original energy state. Some of it gets sent back do...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 3:38 pm
[quote]plant respiration increases and thus water vapor concentration increases. Water is the great earthly capacitor. It would have a temperature stabilizing effect.[/quote] Im not often speechless... to be clear, you are arguing an increase in water vapor concentration would cause temps to ...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 3:24 pm
[quote]For example when CO2 is 80.6 degrees it takes 0.202 btu to raise one pound of CO2 one degree. But when CO2 is 128 degrees it take a little more energy (0.208 btu) to raise one pound of CO2 one degree.[/quote] Wait? Specific heat? But why? The theory is the extra IR radiation the CO2...

re: Global warming - Physics approach

Posted by Duke on 6/7/24 at 3:13 pm
Everyone in the field or even in adjacent fields already knows the forcing is a logarithmic relationship to concentration. Its already built into the models. Hey baws, what ever happened to that grand solar minimum some of ya were crowing about a few years ago? ...
I'll write some stuff up if we get some gulf action looming, dont worry. ...
[quote]You seem gay[/quote] Pandy Fackler does suck dicks under the promenade. ...

re: Colorado Trip Ideas

Posted by Duke on 6/6/24 at 12:39 pm
[quote] Got any suggestions for hikes in your area?[/quote][quote] Got any suggestions for hikes in your area?[/quote] Just about all my go tos are snowed over current. If they arent snowed over, the mud is an issue anywhere with a drainage. This is one of the more prolific early summer sno...
Oh my weather is going to be marvelous for the next four months. Thats the trade for 8 months of winter weather. ...
I mean, its 65 and sunny here @11:15 Awesome weather but boring. Which makes this a great thread to dick around in while putting off chores. ...
I love shoulder season. Got another week and a half to enjoy before vacation is over. Going to Utah next week. Cleanup and packing today. Eggo waffles (1 year old loves them and well, I enjoy being a fatty) Happy Thurs. 10% off carts at the dispo today. :pimp:...
Snake Oil. Irs dressed up climo. Oh there's gonna be something in the gulf in June? No shite, most years there's some pissant storm in June. The northern Gulf Coast is under the gun from mid/late august to mid Sep? Naw? Its not like 80% of the hurricanes of record in that region have happ...
Right now, we have the big picture. Very high SST. La Nina pattern should yield lower shear in the Caribbean and Gulf as the subtropical jet is weaker. Big picture is hyperactive. But then we got saharan dust to think about. Are we gonna have an active wave train (this was part of the 2020 s...