| Favorite team: | Houston Astros  |
| Location: | Rice and Easy Baby!!! |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 29318 |
| Registered on: | 11/4/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: AEW Rampage/WWE Smackdown Thread: Thy Kingdom Come Edition
Posted by LSU316 on 5/31/24 at 8:59 pm
Well if they are gonna do over AJ v Cody at least they started it right this time....
1
re: Anyone else notice the amount of Poors has been increasing?
Posted by LSU316 on 5/31/24 at 11:02 am
Yea not even close I used to be able to feed all the kids at Sonic for about 15-20 bucks….its over 30 now. Just the kids me and my wife hardly ever eat fast food....
re: LNST: God created the Smuckers Uncrustables
Posted by LSU316 on 5/22/24 at 10:29 pm
Wheated Wednesday…..Weller green label...
re: "I have 2 men in my life, so I wear a wedding ring and a commitment ring..."
Posted by LSU316 on 5/20/24 at 11:24 pm
[quote]commitment-oriented [/quote]
Clearly this is false....
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by LSU316 on 5/11/24 at 12:07 pm
That’s not the rule the rule from the book has been posted 100 times since it happened the runner has to interfere with the throw…..clearly that never happened....
re: Two feet to the left of the baseline is interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 10:08 pm
Didn’t interfere with the throw or receipt of….. not interference....
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 10:04 pm
I agree….my prior post was not facetious it was a thank you for the ruling….a sincere one :cheers:...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 10:03 pm
Your circle of red has leeway to the inside of the foul line toward the infield :lol:
So which is it?...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 10:02 pm
Welp boys that about does for this thread….thank you sir!!!!...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 10:00 pm
One thing I would like is to have umpire press conferences where that home plate ump has to speak directly to the media/world on his reason for making or not making that call……I’d be all for that....
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:58 pm
It’s a letter of law vs intent of law situation there and can go either way…..if you watch a lot of baseball you’ve seen that not called more than it’s called most likely.
Now somebody said earlier he was on the infield grass at one point which makes it a more egregious no call…..but based on tha...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:52 pm
Clearly that is not enforced 100% of the time….if that is a written rule.
It’s not even close to 100% actually....
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:51 pm
[quote]the foul line and a line that is 3 feet to the foul side of that line.[/quote]
Got the official paragraph on that one because it sure does get overlooked a helluva lot at all levels of ball I watch....
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:48 pm
Wait some dude said there was no “base path” but a “running lane”…..which is it?...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:46 pm
[quote]There is a running lane however[/quote]
What is your opinion of where this might be….a 3in strip of white chalk?...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:45 pm
[quote]if either foot is outside either line.[/quote]
This suggests 2 lines right….stay with me…..what are they?...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:43 pm
Learn to code bitch!...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:42 pm
That I didn’t see in real time or on replay which does not mean it didn’t happen…..if the runner bowed out onto the infield grass then came back to the base were he crossed it then I’m surprised it wasn’t called either way…..that is an egregious no call of clearly altering the runner’s path to the b...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:39 pm
Again if the runner would have been closer to actually impacting the receipt of the ball by 1B then it may have been called……that may not be how it’s supposed to work but that’s how people work right or wrong.
One thing is for absolutely sure a good throw would have resulted in an out without int...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by LSU316 on 5/10/24 at 9:37 pm
2-3 feet LOL….the dude wasn’t on the grass....
Popular
24
