Started By
Message
Top 15 NIL Collectives
Posted on 8/29/24 at 11:19 am
Posted on 8/29/24 at 11:19 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 10. Every True Tiger (Missouri)
11. Texas Aggies United (Texas A&M)
12. Yea Alabama (Alabama)
13. Champions Circle (Michigan)
14. The FUND (Notre Dame)
15. Arkansas Edge (Arkansas)
LINK
This post was edited on 8/29/24 at 3:03 pm
13
Posted on 8/29/24 at 11:22 am to Wanruningchen
Posted on 8/29/24 at 1:29 pm to Wanruningchen
Two ACC teams making 10M/y less than the rest of us...we'll see how long that lasts lol
Posted on 8/29/24 at 2:09 pm to Wanruningchen
Pretty embarrassing for anyone who's not on this list. Broke arse schools
Posted on 8/29/24 at 3:03 pm to Wanruningchen
Is this just talking about recruiting? I would find it hard to believe that Georgia could keep their roster intact with a Collective ranked outside of the Top 15 given how aggressively other schools target the rosters of top programs.
Posted on 8/29/24 at 3:38 pm to Wanruningchen
Top ten in what way?
Posted on 8/29/24 at 3:46 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Is this just talking about recruiting? I would find it hard to believe that Georgia could keep their roster intact with a Collective ranked outside of the Top 15 given how aggressively other schools target the rosters of top programs.
Over the past three years, the college sports landscape has been altered. Donor-driven NIL collectives will make up 80% of all NIL dollars spent in college football this season. These organizations have become imperative to fielding a top roster in both football and basketball,
What makes a top NIL collective?
This post was edited on 8/29/24 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 8/29/24 at 3:48 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
Posted on 8/29/24 at 3:51 pm to Wanruningchen
My questions stands. It seems unlikely the Georgia could sign a number 1 class and retain so much of its roster with a mediocre collective.
Posted on 8/29/24 at 4:10 pm to Crowknowsbest
True. This year UGA transferred in 3 4-star, 6 3-star, transferred out 7 4-stars 18 3-star, and “saved” 1.5 M. It is still possible that UGA might finish 2025 recruit not in top-5 (compare to #1 last year).
Posted on 8/29/24 at 4:10 pm to Wanruningchen
Thank you
Posted on 8/29/24 at 4:45 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
My questions stands. It seems unlikely the Georgia could sign a number 1 class and retain so much of its roster with a mediocre collective.
Well it's possible that NIL isn't the 100% deciding factor for recruits. College players know this current UGA staff is pumping out NFL players at all positions so UGA probably doesn't have to pay as much as some schools. Same goes for Bama.
Posted on 8/29/24 at 4:54 pm to Wanruningchen
Any criterion or is ON3 just pulling shite out of their arse again?!?
Posted on 8/29/24 at 4:57 pm to GerryDiNardo
quote:
What makes a top NIL collective?
Then doesn't explain what criteria they're using at all. Typical On3 clickbait shite. We should start a collective to tell Shannon Terry to frick off.
Posted on 8/29/24 at 4:58 pm to Quicksilver
quote:
Well it's possible that NIL isn't the 100% deciding factor for recruits. College players know this current UGA staff is pumping out NFL players at all positions so UGA probably doesn't have to pay as much as some schools. Same goes for Bama.
Sure, but I think it’s a stretch to say that this pitch would be satisfactory to enough players to put together a roster like UGA’s (or Alabama’s, to your point).
I think a more likely scenario is that UGA and Alabama are also spending lots of money, but the bulk of it is directed toward retention of their current players rather than paying recruits, which tends to grab more headlines.
I hope UGA is getting a discount, but doubt it’s that much of one.
To me, this list seems like it more likely reflects the “loudest” collectives, but not necessarily the best.
This post was edited on 8/29/24 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 8/29/24 at 5:27 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Top ten in what way?
I see maybe 2 possibly only 3 at most of those schools in the top 10 making the playoffs. Alot of money being spent not to advance their programs
Posted on 8/29/24 at 5:37 pm to Wanruningchen
According to Josh Pate or an On3, one of those podcasts, 1-4 are the only programs to spend over $20M on their rosters.
Posted on 8/29/24 at 5:41 pm to Wanruningchen
But I've been told Auburn is doing nothing but handing out cash.
WHAT GIVES?
WHAT GIVES?
Posted on 8/29/24 at 6:00 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
But I've been told Auburn is doing nothing but handing out cash.
WHAT GIVES?
I been told by your compadres that UA is slinging out tons of money just to get kids to commit but not sign. If so, I would think with the class, we currently have we would be higher up on the list.
WHAT GIVES?
Posted on 8/29/24 at 6:56 pm to TideWarrior
You’re top 12, buddy. We aren’t even listed.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News