Started By
Message
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:05 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Who gave the murderers a ride home, Bradley or Miller?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:06 pm to cmayes56
So how did they get home?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:06 pm to SidewalkTiger
You caught yourself in a lie and edited.. lmfao
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:07 pm to SidewalkTiger
Uber
With no guns
Lol
With no guns
Lol
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:07 pm to cmayes56
quote:
You caught yourself in a lie and edited.. lmfao
He's out of his element when he tries to do anything other than his usual passive aggressive shtick.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:07 pm to Contra
quote:
I'm glad the university hasn't caved to an angry mob. Cancel culture has no place in society. The guy hasn't been charged with anything because there is nothing there according to DA and he is a fully cooperating witness. Again, why are we punishing someone that is innocent? Because a mob says he's guilty?
This.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:08 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:I acknowledge that some of that info is not likely to be released prior to the trial, with good reason. The list was in response to the question in the OP.
The DA is not going to put any of this information out before the trials of Davis and Miles, even if the info would be helpful to the public’s desire to determine the level of Miller’s involvement.
However, some of it, including an explanation of what additional evidence/information was considered regarding why the DA chose not to prosecute Miller given the testimony of the detective, seems like fair game and appropriate right now.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:08 pm to tivey6301
quote:
This is very similar to the left's argument for their desired confiscation of gun's. By the left's argument, the gun exists for improper purposes and therefore the individual should not have it. I reject this theory. I have many, many, many guns and so far NONE of them have shot anyone.
what on earth
I'm as big a 2A proponent as you can find. Having a standard whereby your athletes don't bring guns to a guy at 1AM after said guy says he's going get into it with some dude has nothing to do with 2A matters.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:10 pm to hogcard1964
It's interesting that Bammers will swear that neither Miller nor Bradley drove the murderers home but they can't actually tell you how said murderers got home.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:10 pm to WDE24
The DA doesn’t owe you an explanation… this isn’t hard!
He’s making a case against Miles and Davis. He’s not wasting his time to explain to a mob why he didn’t charge a witness.
He’s making a case against Miles and Davis. He’s not wasting his time to explain to a mob why he didn’t charge a witness.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:11 pm to SidewalkTiger
If you think Miller or Bradley drove them home then you’re just dense.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:12 pm to cmayes56
quote:
If you think Miller or Bradley drove them home then you’re just dense.
Classic deflection.
Do you have proof that Bradley or Miller didn't drive them home?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:13 pm to cmayes56
quote:An elected official doesn’t owe the public an explanation about why he didn’t charge someone with a crime where the detectives sworn testimony implicated that person?
The DA doesn’t owe you an explanation
That’s a strange position to take. It has generally been recognized and accepted that is the type of information DAs are required to account for all of the time.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:13 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
It's interesting that Bammers will swear that neither Miller nor Bradley drove the murderers home but they can't actually tell you how said murderers got home.
Why don't you share with the rest of the class if you know something?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/shrug.gif)
Or is this more of your usual passive aggressive bullshite designed to try and cast aspersions without actually knowing anything?
Hmmm...I know which one I'd put my money on.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:14 pm to cmayes56
quote:if it turns out one of them did, do you think they should be arrested or at least disciplined by the university?
If you think Miller or Bradley drove them home then you’re just dense.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:15 pm to SidewalkTiger
It doesn't matter if they drove any of the thugs home. He provided a murder weapon to a killer.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:15 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:Miles needed a ride….It is the only reason Miller went to the scene…. Miller did not provide Miles with a ride, that is so stupid of you to think that!
It's interesting that Bammers will swear that neither Miller nor Bradley drove the murderers home but they can't actually tell you how said murderers got home.
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:15 pm to SidewalkTiger
Do you have proof they did?
Considering the circumstances of this case , had Miller driven them home he would have in all likelihood been charged as well. He wasn’t!
Common sense is a Super Power that you obviously don’t possess.
There’s several videos of the shooting, including Millers on dash cam.
You think he said , after I drop you boys off I’m going to the police and tell them what I saw and turn over my phone and camera “… lol
C’mon man
Considering the circumstances of this case , had Miller driven them home he would have in all likelihood been charged as well. He wasn’t!
Common sense is a Super Power that you obviously don’t possess.
There’s several videos of the shooting, including Millers on dash cam.
You think he said , after I drop you boys off I’m going to the police and tell them what I saw and turn over my phone and camera “… lol
C’mon man
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:17 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Sir, bringing a requested gun with the understanding that there was trouble to what becomes a murder scene is a crime.
How many attorneys would you like for me to quote?
quote:
If someone aids in the killing of another person but isn't present when the murder is committed, they can be charged as an “accessory to murder.”
Alabama Code Section 13A-2-23 is the statue that defines whether someone is an accessory to a crime. That statute says:
A person is accountable for the behavior of another constituting an offense if, with the intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense:
(1) He/she procures, induces or causes the other person to commit the offense;
(2) He/she aids or abets the other person in committing the offense; [or] (CHECK)
(3) Having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, he/she fails to make an effort he/she is legally required to make. (CHECK)
Intent remains the issue. Proving that Miller had the intent to assist Miles and Davis in the commission of the murder would be difficult. The DA doesn’t seem to have any evidence that Miller had said intent, which is why he examines uncharged.
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 12:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)