Started By
Message

re: Off-season topic: revisiting the ‘77 season

Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:54 pm to
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
20448 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

The NCAA does not recognize national championships. If you think they do, please show me the process and rules they have made in order to decide which championships are legitimate or not. What they have is a website where some editor just puts out a list where they will put anything schools claim on there.


Welp, there goes half of your claimed championships then.
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21669 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:56 pm to
It doesn't matter what you and the polls believe who the champion was that year.

Arkansas proved it on the field that year by going unbeaten. Arkansas claimed the title and should have done so in 77. Nothing can be said or done to change that.

Naming a champion before the bowls are played was stupid and backwards. Just another reason why the playoffs should have happened decades ago.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31145 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Notre Dame - finished 1st in the AP and UPI. Defeated Texas 38-10 in the Cotton Bowl and jumped from 5 to 1 after the bowls. Only loss was to Ole Miss in Jackson.

Alabama - finished 2 in both polls. Crushed Ohio State 35-6 in the Sugar. Only loss was to 9-3 Nebraska in Lincoln.


It should also be noted that Alabama beat Ole Miss that same year.

There were bumper stickers that read, "Just ask Ole Miss who the champs are!"
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
23217 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Welp, there goes half of your claimed championships then.


Happens all the time. Watch TV and the media will only mention AP, Coaches, BCS or playoff national championships.

Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31145 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Alabama could claim well over 20 national championships if they used the standards other schools have adopted in recent years with the bullshite excuse of "Alabama"


Over 30 actually.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31145 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Naming a champion before the bowls are played was stupid and backwards.


Originally the bowl games weren't treated seriously - they, at the time, were treated more like exhibition matches.

Coaches had to change their approach to the games when they started to count. Players could no longer just chill on the beach in the days leading up to the game.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
23217 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

dchog
It doesn't matter what you and the polls believe who the champion was that year.

Arkansas proved it on the field that year by going unbeaten. Arkansas claimed the title and should have done so in 77. Nothing can be said or done to change that.

Naming a champion before the bowls are played was stupid and backwards. Just another reason why the playoffs should have happened decades ago.


You are just awarding yourself national championships because "meh feelings".

Bowl games were considered exhibition games and did not count. Some teams wouldn't even play in them at all. The teams went into those games AFTER already having been awarded the national championship a month prior to playing in them. That is the reality of it. It's not like they waited until the bowls were over to say - oh well we only counted until the end of the season, they awarded long before the bowl games were even played.

It was actually pretty common for teams to win national championships and then lose in the bowl game. It only became a problem in the 60's because of Alabama and the political atmosphere at the time.
This post was edited on 6/29/24 at 9:03 pm
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
25682 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:20 pm to
FWIW- I enjoy the dialogue in these threads more than a Schloss thread

I love to debate the old split title era championships.
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21669 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:33 pm to
Which is why they are mythical national champions. You can have 10 unbeaten teams claiming national titles in the same year and the same with 10 one loss teams. No one is going to change the opinion of these programs that claim these titles and no reason for anyone to be mad about them claiming those titles. You might as well argue with a rock.

You get the polls involved and they pick the champions but the problem is you got politics and bias involved that favor some programs over others. It was a broken system and the BCS wasn't much better. People complained more and the powers that resisted for decades finally decided on a playoff. They didn't want that because that took power away from them and let it be done on the field the way it should be.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
23217 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

FWIW- I enjoy the dialogue in these threads more than a Schloss thread

I love to debate the old split title era championships.


Main problem with these things is people often times don't understand the times.

I mean sure, Alabama has a strong case for 77, but that's just not how people voted. Happened in 66 as well. Alabama wins the NC in 64, 65, goes undefeated in 66 and Notre Dame ties Michigan St, doesn't play in a bowl game at all, but wins the NC.

On the one hand it sucks, but on the other hand it's just how it was. The votes were often not 100%.

And there is a whole story behind the reasons why and how the Big10 and Pac along with the Rose Bowl blocked change in CFP for decades and how everyone else forced them to change.
Posted by rtr23242526
Member since Dec 2022
2817 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 9:49 pm to
Voted..Notre dame Damm cheating bias
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
20448 posts
Posted on 6/29/24 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

Originally the bowl games weren't treated seriously - they, at the time, were treated more like exhibition matches. Coaches had to change their approach to the games when they started to count. Players could no longer just chill on the beach in the days leading up to the game.


So you’re saying Bear Bryant told his team to just lay around until game time so they could get the shite beat out of them? I call bullshite on that.


Even you dudes can’t seriously believe that. You boys are hilarious…
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
31145 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

So you’re saying Bear Bryant told his team to just lay around until game time so they could get the shite beat out of them? I call bullshite on that.


Even you dudes can’t seriously believe that. You boys are hilarious…


Sure, if you were a complete idiot, you might interpret it that way.

That being said, what would YOU call a game that happened AFTER the conference title had been awarded and AFTER the national championship had been awarded?

You frickers have players opting out of bowl games NOW.

Well, not Arkansas, to be fair. You guys don't even go to bowl games anymore.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
23217 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 5:42 pm to
quote:


So you’re saying Bear Bryant told his team to just lay around until game time so they could get the shite beat out of them? I call bullshite on that.


Even you dudes can’t seriously believe that. You boys are hilarious…


You don't seem to understand how things happened. You and others falsely seem to believe the National Championship was awarded after the bowl games.

It wasn't.

The National Championship and other awards happened before the bowl games, nearly a month before. Those players walked into those games knowing that the game made no difference, they were already national champions. The final AP/Coaches poll having been released weeks prior.

You can ignore that if you want, but you are wrong to do so. Imagine if Michigan played in some invitational game sometime in February, and lost. And now 60 years later some dork who doesn't understand shite starts claiming it's proof Michigan wasn't the NC and this other team should be.

That's what you do.
Posted by N0T SURE
Member since Dec 2023
268 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 5:51 pm to
Ive always wondered why pig never claimed it....lots of teams out there have claimed with much much less of a resume.
Posted by rtr23242526
Member since Dec 2022
2817 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 6:09 pm to
Bowl games exhibition but any real competitor competes 1000%
Posted by LittleRockHog501
Member since Nov 2011
2486 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 6:18 pm to
My rationale is whatever gives Arkansas the claim to that title.
Posted by Clark14
L.A.Hog
Member since Dec 2014
20448 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Ive always wondered why pig never claimed it....lots of teams out there have claimed with much much less of a resume.


Personally I was so shocked and happy about winning that game it never really occurred to me about being national champions. That type of deal never happens for us deserved or not.
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
2219 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 8:03 pm to
That's what's impressive about 1971 Nebraska, They'd already been voted #1 in the Coaches poll and still went out and destroyed #2 Bama in the Orange Bowl.
Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter