Started By
Message
re: Nine men and an umpire 7---Arkansas 6; Bot 12th
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:54 am to LSUBASEBALL06
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:54 am to LSUBASEBALL06
quote:
That interference call was the right call.
Bull fricking shite. The batter doesn't have to move at all. It was an inside pitch and the catcher he moved to his left and then threw over Eibner.
1
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:54 am to wmr
So you are saying, the catcher went into the batters box to throw down to 2nd?
Contact was made, Eibner, although not INTENTIONAL was over the plate after he struck out and interference was called. Correct call.
And it has nothing to do with Eibner being 6'4"
Contact was made, Eibner, although not INTENTIONAL was over the plate after he struck out and interference was called. Correct call.
And it has nothing to do with Eibner being 6'4"
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:54 am to LSUBASEBALL06
quote:
He was definately over the plate when the catcher threw down to 2nd and made contact with Eibner. That equals interference.
He had one foot that just came out of the box because he was off balance from swinging at an outside pitch. Eibner barely had time to duck if he had realized what was going on.
He didn't walk forward. He didn't lean to get in the way. He was off balance and his step caught him. There was little he could have done. It's a chicken shite call to make.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:55 am to Choctaw Hog
quote:
quote:
That interference call was the right call.
Bull fricking shite. The batter doesn't have to move at all. It was an inside pitch and the catcher he moved to his left and then threw over Eibner.
If Eibner doesn't move, there is no call. BUT HE DID MOVE.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:57 am to Eternalmajin
quote:
He had one foot that just came out of the box because he was off balance from swinging at an outside pitch. Eibner barely had time to duck if he had realized what was going on.
One poster said he was swinging at an outside pitch, and he was off balance. One said he swung at an inside pitch, and the catcher came through the box to throw down.
I guess we all saw different things.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:59 am to Geauxboy
quote:
He's got to make an effort to get out of the way.
No he doesn't.
(c) He interferes with the catcher’s fielding or throwing by stepping out of the batter’s box or making any other movement that hinders the catcher’s play at home base. EXCEPTION: Batter is not out if any runner attempting to advance is put out, or if runner trying to score is called out for batter’s interference.
Rule 6.06(c) Comment: If the batter interferes with the catcher, the plate umpire shall call “interference.” The batter is out and the ball dead. No player may advance on such interference (offensive interference) and all runners must return to the last base that was, in the judgment of the umpire, legally touched at the time of the interference.
LINK
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:00 am to LSUBASEBALL06
quote:
If Eibner doesn't move, there is no call. BUT HE DID MOVE.
Please show me a video of any batter not moving when he swings. Damn.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:01 am to Choctaw Hog
ARK cost themselves the game, not the ump
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:02 am to Choctaw Hog
quote:
Please show me a video of any batter not moving when he swings. Damn.
Moves out of the box. And you idiot know what I am talking about. He moved forward and was over the plate when the catcher threw down to 2nd.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:02 am to Choctaw Hog
Our team needs to forget it and get ready for tomorrow night. We need to control what we can control, tonight we had some pretty bad base running and a few errors.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:02 am to Lester Earl
quote:
ARK cost themselves the game, not the ump
No shite? We had our opportunities but getting bull shite calls didn't help our cause.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:05 am to LSUBASEBALL06
quote:
Moves out of the box. And you idiot know what I am talking about. He moved forward and was over the plate when the catcher threw down to 2nd.
If Eibner doesn't move, there is no call. BUT HE DID MOVE.
Here is what you posted. I can't help it if you can't properly construct a sentence to convey what you mean.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:05 am to LSUBASEBALL06
quote:
I guess we all saw different things.
If I remember the pitch, it was that outside corner changeup. Eibner swung for it and missed, throwing him off balance leaning towards the other batters box. As his swing came back, his foot came out to catch himself.
The catcher got up and threw the ball leaning himself towards Eibner to make sure he was "in the way." The throw wasn't even close because he didn't even try for it to be close. The fricker was halfway to the dugout before the ump finished making the call.
Eibner did nothing to move into the way other than stopping himself from falling, which is easily described as a natural motion to swinging hard at a pitch you try to reach for. It's a horseshite call.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:06 am to Choctaw Hog
I know what I posted.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:07 am to Eternalmajin
whether you try to interfere or incidentally interfere, its still interference.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:07 am to LSUBASEBALL06
You don't see that as a fair call. If it had happened to LSU you'd be livid. It happened to us TWICE.
AZ St had to get only 2 outs TWICE in that game.
That combined with the stike zone was complete horseshite.
I don't bitch about officiating. Review my post record.
Tonight, it was completely fricked.
AZ St had to get only 2 outs TWICE in that game.
That combined with the stike zone was complete horseshite.
I don't bitch about officiating. Review my post record.
Tonight, it was completely fricked.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:08 am to wmr
Yes I am in FULL Agreement that the strike zone was not good.
But the game wasnt won or lost on that one correct interference call.
But the game wasnt won or lost on that one correct interference call.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:09 am to LSUBASEBALL06
The officiating was fricked and it changed the outcome of the game.
Period.
You're being a retard.
Period.
You're being a retard.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:09 am to wmr
quote:
If it had happened to LSU you'd be livid. It happened to us TWICE.
This.. The only reason he is saying this is because he hates Arkansas and is butthurt that LSU couldn't make it to the SR
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:11 am to Woopigsooie20
I do not hate Arkansas.
I was pulling for Arkansas today. I want 5 SEC teams in Omaha.
The umpiring tonight was horrible. But that one call was not.
I was pulling for Arkansas today. I want 5 SEC teams in Omaha.
The umpiring tonight was horrible. But that one call was not.
Page 28 of 29
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News