Started By
Message

re: Mike Slive wants you to know that Gene Chizik is right

Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:35 am to
Posted by secftw
FL
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:35 am to
Bet Slive wouldn't say that to Julie's face.

Bitch got the Chiz to pee his pants, what do you think that puss Slive would do if she busted his chops in public?
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Yep, I believe auburn will play this more like Ga Tech


Investigators never found proof or established a paper trail indicating former players, specifically Demaryius Thomas and Morgan Burnett, received improper benefits from agents.

-AJC
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:40 am to
Lolz at this flame attempt...
Posted by 12
Redneck part of Florida
Member since Nov 2010
18772 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 7:45 am to
quote:

beatbammer


Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4231 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:20 am to
That is not the point at all. Not even close actually. This has nothing to do with guilt or innocence.

The point is that auburn is not going to admit to receiving a LOI from the ncaa.

Tell me what benefit it would be for auburn to admit to receiving a LOI?

Now, what would be the drawbacks to admitting to receiving a LOI?

The drawbacks will far outweigh the benefits....
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:34 am to
quote:

auisssa



So Bama releases their secondaries 3-4 months after the same request, So the conclusion is since Auburn hasn't relesed the info on the same day as Bama they are refusing to release anything regarding the request? is this the assumption you are trying to get across
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9451 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:35 am to
Couldnt everyone assume they got a LOI since Chizz asked when the Investigation will be over>?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Couldnt everyone assume they got a LOI since Chizz asked when the Investigation will be over>?


Ummm, NO
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9451 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:38 am to
Does the NCAA investigate without a LOI?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Does the NCAA investigate without a LOI?

yes
Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4231 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:01 am to
Shall I try again?

Tell me what benefit it would be for auburn to admit to receiving a LOI?

Now, what would be the drawbacks to admitting to receiving a LOI?
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6942 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:02 am to
Slive also didn't want any of his (SEC) teams on probation and look at us now. I guess he felt like if he could cover for one, that would make him feel better.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:03 am to
quote:

auisssa


I am refering to what you were originaly saying in this thread.
Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4231 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I am refering to what you were originaly saying in this thread.


Fair enough...but if you look at my posts, I am saying that auburn is not going to admit to receiving a LOI because it is not good publicity for them to do so.

Same as Ga Tech did and the same as Alabama did during the textbook investigation.

I really don't think auburn has that much to gain by saying they have a LOI, therefore I don't think they will alert to media to anything.

As far as the FOI request for secondaries, that was in response to a post about what auburn was hiding. I personally don't think that is a big issue. Again, Alabama is still not releasing secondary violations from Saban's 1st year.
This post was edited on 7/20/11 at 9:09 am
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
15615 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:11 am to
quote:

I really don't think auburn has that much to gain by saying they have a LOI, therefore I don't think they will alert to media to anything.


Correct. This also allows the head in the sand morons to cling to the hope that there is no ongoing investigation. Then they run to messageboards and post crap about it.

It's not a big deal either way IMO.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:13 am to
I thought it was a race between Arky and Aubie on who has the dumbest most ignorant fans




you have helped Aubie pull miles in front of the piggers
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
15615 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:15 am to
quote:

you have helped Aubie pull miles in front of the piggers


I'll second that. He is the worst poster on the SEC rant right now. No one else is close.
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
16271 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:20 am to
we may be leading the Piggers, as you say - but we are light years behind you.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30341 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Does the NCAA investigate without a LOI?







Yes

Didn't they send LSU an LOI one day and four days later you got your NOA?

IMO, By the time a school gets the LOI, the NCAA is done with the heavy work of investigating......
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
49252 posts
Posted on 7/20/11 at 9:54 am to
i cant believe the amount of updykes wishing that there is an investigation in auburn
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter