Started By
Message
re: Here are the largest NIL collective funding estimates in the country including SEC schools
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:14 pm to JetDawg
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:14 pm to JetDawg
This is more of what it should be, however it is not what it actually is. A lot of those schools listed in the top 10 are not embracing NIL, while schools like Ole Miss and Arkansas are over performing.
Talking with some of the people in the know at OM, that is about half of what is invested in NIL right now.
Talking with some of the people in the know at OM, that is about half of what is invested in NIL right now.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 3:15 pm
0
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:16 pm to JetDawg
Impossible, I thought LSU was poor?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:16 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Rare to see a legal citizen in houston these days
That's just how bad Louisiana is, you live in the s-hole known as Houston
Lol
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:18 pm to aspiclark
quote:
data for this simply do not exist. if you read their methodology, these projections are a fun little project for somebody but these numbers are beyond worthless and backed by a bunch of nonstatistical assumptions.
LINK /
would be nice to have more transparency into nil if it’s going to be the way players are paid moving forward but as it stands, there is none.
Yep, they say:
To present the data on estimated funding available from NIL Collectives we rely on data from multiple sources as well as certain assumptions regarding the data. Unlike public Universities, virtually all NIL Collectives are privately controlled and have no obligation to publicly report information such as their annual fundraising or how funds are spent. Additionally, most NIL collectives are very protective of their funding.
Accordingly, our estimates are not what specific collectives receive in contributions. Instead, we are providing what we believe to be a reasonable estimate of funding a collective(s) supporting the school might be expected to generate in funding, given the school’s historic level of support from boosters.
Which is a fancy way of saying it's a guestimate.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:24 pm to JetDawg
quote:
3. LSU -- $20,137,141
Special message for everyone else...
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:25 pm to SpotCheckBilly
quote:
it's a guestimate
Which is hilarious when they note them literally down to the dollar.
And they don't include Vanderbilt — if NIL collectives are privately controlled and you're just guessing what they have anyway, why can't you simply guess for them too?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:29 pm to Pickle_Weasel
quote:
This is absolutely incorrect.
It's so far off that it's laughable.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:32 pm to Maytheporkbewithyou
quote:
lol...your AD was going to fire Cal but couldn't scrape up the money for the buyout and then hire another coach. Kentucky couldn't afford Oates buyout so you quickly moved on. lol...what a shitshow
I love these shots coming from a school that:
Fired Bobby Petrino
Hired John L Smith
Hired Bert
Hired Chad Morris
Hired Pit Boss
Rehired Petrino
You all defined shitshow!
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 4/11/24 at 3:33 pm to JetDawg
quote:
Florida probably ranks even lower if private schools were included. List is legit. But, Florida is trash, though.
Florida is not in the top 20 of NIL. This is a bad list.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:15 pm to JetDawg
These "estimates" aren't worth the free bits they were printed with. You think these NIL's publishing accurate data.
I got a bridge to sell you.
I got a bridge to sell you.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:21 pm to JetDawg
quote:Wrong! WTH, Are these numbers from 3 years ago?
7. Alabama -- $15,995,406
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:26 pm to SpotCheckBilly
quote:They have no fricking clue.
Accordingly, our estimates are not what specific collectives receive in contributions. Instead, we are providing what we believe to be a reasonable estimate of funding a collective(s) supporting the school might be expected to generate in funding, given the school’s historic level of support from boosters.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:27 pm to JetDawg
quote:Ironically, more $$ seems to have an inverse effect on commitment & effort.
The SEC is the only conference to show an average NIL funding increase in 2024 over the previous year of 2023
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:30 pm to CBandits82
Yeah, this board would have you believe LSU is Vanderbilt level poor. In actuality, it’s 3rd best in the nation. Aggie lies I guess
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:59 pm to Aggie Class of 2026
Lol you assume a lot. I don't live in texas or louisiana anymore. Not since I started work from home.
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:09 pm to JetDawg
quote:
27. Ole Miss -- $ 8,872,378
It’s 14-16M
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:14 pm to paperwasp
Would it surprise anyone to know that OP is a retired journalist?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:19 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Would it surprise anyone to know that OP is a retired journalist?
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:28 pm to ManBearSharkReb
OM was at 12.5mm area 2 years ago and has over 8k annual givers not including corporate donors...I personally know several that are 1k-2k a year that never gave to the athletic department fund...we are probably 15+ easy now
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:53 pm to JetDawg
quote:there's not that many $2 bills in existence -
9. Clemson -- $15,258,374
don't be misled - they combined their individual collectives and partnered with IPTAY to form a singular entity end of FY2023 - which bases its total valuation to include IPTAY funds so it looks impressive to sell to recruits/current athletes -
but most all of the IPTAY monies continue to be allocated for existing means to operate and not to NIL directly - CD Davies is using smoke & mirrors to achieve this figure - it's a nice marketing ploy - and it will indeed fool people into thinking they have more to give than they actually do - or can - or will -
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News