Started By
Message

Group of Five Conferences are planning their own dedicated Top 25 Polls
Posted on 5/7/24 at 9:47 am
Posted on 5/7/24 at 9:47 am
Preliminary groundwork already is underway for the American, Conference-USA, Mid-American, Mountain West and SunBelt conferences to have an official Group of Five Top 25 national poll, with voting open only to head coaches in those leagues. Independent programs UConn and UMass also will be included in the rankings, pushing the number of teams involved to be approximately 64.
Perhaps they'll even come up with their own "bowl game system", etc. Stick a fork in it -- college sports is done.
LINK
Perhaps they'll even come up with their own "bowl game system", etc. Stick a fork in it -- college sports is done.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/7/24 at 9:48 am
Posted on 5/7/24 at 9:52 am to JetDawg
quote:
Perhaps they'll even come up with their own "bowl game system", etc. Stick a fork in it -- college sports is done.
I'm not advocating for what's happening to college football, but isn't it a bit of an overreaction to say college sports are "done" because the G5 is making their own top 25 poll? We're talking about a sport that has been absolutely dominated by a handful of programs since World War II. It's not like we're suddenly creating a system of haves and have nots, it has always been this way. If you can name one school that is currently in any of the G5 conferences that you want Georgia to put on the schedule, I'll drop this argument entirely.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:08 am to BreakawayZou83
Really a rehash of FBS/FCS from the BCS days. Seems like a natural evolution in response to the coming landscape changes.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:25 am to BreakawayZou83
I assume if they create their own poll they will be excluded from the current coaches poll. They will lose exposure. No one talked about d2 top 25 and no one talk about the g5 poll. Some of these smaller schools get exposure when included in the polls. I never knew of liberty until they were winning and ranked in the polls. No one will pay attention to the G5 poll
Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:41 am to JetDawg
Only old folks like me know the truth. There is no real college football anymore. All we have is pro and semi pro. As a Southern Mississippi and LSU fan I will say this. In the 80’s and 90’s USM played Bama almost every year. Back then gave Bama close games and actually made Bama sweat. Now, the games when they play are over in 10 minutes. USM type teams cannot pay the pros to play.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:48 am to Tiger2tiga
It won’t get talked about a lot but i imagine towards end of the season when a 9-3 sec team vs 9-3 big ten team vs 10 win acc/big 12 team conversation starts about last one or two playoff spots, ppl will care quick
Posted on 5/7/24 at 12:55 pm to JetDawg
They need their own playoff like D2 and FCS schools do
Posted on 5/7/24 at 1:41 pm to JetDawg
quote:
Group of Five Conferences are planning their own dedicated Top 25 Polls
If they were smart business people the G-5 would have started their own playoffs years ago. Instead of begging for Power 4 leftovers and some semblance of recognition they could be guaranteeing national titles and trophies every year and having a network like ESPN, who would jump at the content.
G-5 has always allowed their vision to outrun their grasp. Why not celebrate mid-tier football instead of sulking every time they were left out of the party?
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:17 pm to JetDawg
I honestly think this could be a great thing. Too many G5 teams with weak schedules are given attaboy rankings. While that may seem all well and good there are plenty of P5 teams that play brutal schedules and accrue losses but would murder those G5s. That stuff meaningless to fans of top teams but it matters a ton to everyone else and it matters to coaches trying to rebuild. It affects a lot of coaches and their pay.
BUT there’s also no doubt that there are G5 teams who have proven something on the field by schedule and winning. They deserve recognition but maybe not over those with worse records against better competition. Then there are the G5s that have special seasons even if it is against dreadful competition as well as just G5s who are in the top of the G5 (many of those could take some mid level P5s.
Hopefully it helps everyone but it also needs to encourage G5s to add P5s to their schedules if their goal is to enter the regular polls.
BUT there’s also no doubt that there are G5 teams who have proven something on the field by schedule and winning. They deserve recognition but maybe not over those with worse records against better competition. Then there are the G5s that have special seasons even if it is against dreadful competition as well as just G5s who are in the top of the G5 (many of those could take some mid level P5s.
Hopefully it helps everyone but it also needs to encourage G5s to add P5s to their schedules if their goal is to enter the regular polls.
This post was edited on 5/7/24 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 5/7/24 at 3:03 pm to JetDawg
Second crybaby thread started by this little pup today. Sit down and be quiet you sidewalker.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 5:49 pm to JetDawg
I don’t have a problem with it.
If they really want to make some noise they should stop playing the big conference schools and schedule among themselves. No more cupcakes for the big boys.
Sure they will miss the big paychecks, but they can return to what college football is supposed to be all about.
If they really want to make some noise they should stop playing the big conference schools and schedule among themselves. No more cupcakes for the big boys.
Sure they will miss the big paychecks, but they can return to what college football is supposed to be all about.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 6:18 pm to JetDawg
This is a good thing for college football in my opinion.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 6:28 pm to Clark14
quote:
Sure they will miss the big paychecks, but they can return to what college football is supposed to be all about.
Not being able to afford the staff and upkeep of a stadium, and cease to exist?
Posted on 5/7/24 at 6:59 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Not being able to afford the staff and upkeep of a stadium, and cease to exist?
They can generate enough interest and income to exist. It just won’t be at big boy level. That’s what college football should be, not a money war. That’s why we are in the shape we’re in today, people aren’t bragging about their teams but how much money their conference is giving shitty teams.
If a league comes up that wants to return to what college football should be I’m all for it. Screw this current buy a team crap….
Posted on 5/7/24 at 7:18 pm to Clark14
quote:
They can generate enough interest and income to exist.
I don't think they can. I don't like it, but it's where we are.
Every one of those G5 teams needs at minimum a 3 game out of conference schedule with a P5 payout rent-a-wins to exist as any kind of athletic program.
That's just how it is.
Popular
Back to top
