Started By
Message
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:51 pm to bmy
The only thing we can agree on is that LSU sucks
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:52 pm to TheTideMustRoll
quote:
The second targeting call was close - a good call, but a close one. That first one, though, will probably be played at future referee seminars as the textbook example of targeting.
I have to agree with this...
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:52 pm to bmy
I'd be willing to bet that your parents didn't allow you to lose enough games/competitions as a child.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:52 pm to RT1941
quote:
He is so unbelievably obsessed with this shite it's comical.
Except he only posts missed called against LSU. If his schtick was bad calls in general then ok. But this is just.....well it's bmy.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:52 pm to bmy
Not trolling... all three of those calls look legit to me.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:53 pm to TheTideMustRoll
quote:
A player running with the ball is not defenseless. A QB in mid-pass is. If you want to complain about the rules, you should try learning them first.
the irony retard
Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet
ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I)
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:53 pm to bmy
quote:LSU was completely dominated by merlins and the cowbells
overtime
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:54 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Except he only posts missed called against LSU. If his schtick was bad calls in general then ok. But this is just.....well it's bmy.
well this isn't true at all
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:55 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
LSU was completely dominated by merlins and the cowbells
even if the refs gifted LSU +30 points they would have lost in overtime. MSU was just that much better than the paper tigers
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:55 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Not trolling... all three of those calls look legit to me.
sorry but i can't fix stupid and i can't teach you to read over the internet
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:55 pm to bmy
quote:
well this isn't true at all
Yea, lots of bmy threads discussing missed penalties on LSU.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:58 pm to oldwave
quote:
I don't like the fact that they are infractions. I don't like the rule.
But, the fact is , according to the rule, they are both infractions.
they're both roughing the passer (barely).
no rational human being can look at those plays and say that either hit qualifies as an attack delivering forcible contact to the head or neck area on either play.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:59 pm to bmy
I wanted them not to be called cause then you guys wouldn't have anything to "blame." We are a good team. LSU is not a bad team. they will go 9-3 this year. keep your chin up we need you guys to win games.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:59 pm to bmy
LSU fans like you make LSU losses so delicious.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 12:59 pm to bmy
Stop whining and take the butt whipping.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:00 pm to yatesdog38
quote:
I wanted them not to be called cause then you guys wouldn't have anything to "blame." We are a good team. LSU is not a bad team. they will go 9-3 this year. keep your chin up we need you guys to win games.
not blaming any bad calls for the arse beating that was delivered. is it so hard to admit that they were fricking terrible calls?
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:01 pm to TheTideMustRoll
quote:
LSU fans like you make LSU losses so delicious.
still can't admit that you were wrong eh? not surprised. cognitive dissonance is a real bitch
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:01 pm to bmy
I see two dirty hits and one offensive pi.
Posted on 9/17/17 at 1:01 pm to bmy
You know, when you have 20 plus down-votes an an entire thread of replies telling you your wrong, even if you think you're right, unless you're a troll, you might want to let it go
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News