Started By
Message

re: Why was Bama so bad from 1992 til 2009 (sans 1999)?

Posted on 7/14/17 at 4:24 pm to
Posted by VagueMessage
Springdale, AR
Member since Jun 2013
3929 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 4:24 pm to
Why did you pick '99 as your exception but skipped '94, '96, '02, '05, and '08? All as good or better years. Is there some reference to this troll I'm not understanding?
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Is there some reference to this troll I'm not understanding?


Yes, the idea that no logic went into it
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72361 posts
Posted on 7/14/17 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

Why did you pick '99 as your exception but skipped '94, '96, '02, '05, and '08? All as good or better years. Is there some reference to this troll I'm not understanding?


So the OP could call it a fluke. Mike Dubose beat Spurrier twice that season.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter