Started By
Message
re: Ole Miss denies FOI "We don't have the NOA" LOL!
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:36 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:36 am to Jjdoc
Fight that mother fricker to your last breath. NCAA has been corrupt through the whole thing.
Were we speeding? Yep.
Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.
Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.
Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.
Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?
Were we speeding? Yep.
Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.
Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.
Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.
Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:51 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
Fight that mother fricker to your last breath. NCAA has been corrupt through the whole thing.
Were we speeding? Yep.
Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.
Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.
Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.
Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:54 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.
With all due respect, you are in complete denial.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:11 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
Were we speeding? Yep.
Putting it mildly.
quote:
Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well.
Love this argument. It's not provable in any real way, but it makes Ole Miss feel better about themselves. Have at it fellas.
quote:
Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that.
How the hell would you know what the NOA proves? You've not seen it and none of us will for another 75+ days.
quote:
Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove.
You will get punished, and it will be for what they can prove, as well as for what they believe (i.e. LOIC).
quote:
It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.
There are 21 football violations (that we know about). 8 of those came as a result of the extended investigation/immunity deals. Not sure how that equates to 90%.
You need to begin to face reality. You'll lose more than the 11 scholarships self imposed. You'll lose more than 1 season of bowl play. You'll take 5+ years to get back to the level you were in 2014/2015. The possibility of your coach being suspended for some period of time is also real.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:58 am to HottyToddy7
quote:
Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no
Bruh.
You're ole miss. And you were bringing in 4 and 5 star recruits. To OXFORD FRICKING MISSISSIPPI.
You can't be any more blatant than that
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:43 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA
Who's name was on those Tunsil texts?
Who was named in these new rounds of allegations?
quote:
and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:57 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
Fight that mother fricker to your last breath. NCAA has been corrupt through the whole thing. Were we speeding? Yep. Were we in the flow of traffic? Yes as well. Were we in a Lambo going 150 on the shoulder flicking off the NCAA, hell no. And the NOA proves that. Should we get punished, yes but for what they can prove. It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players. Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close. You don't think they didn't cross the line to "save face"?
Ahhh. The old "it's not my fault I was speeding, it was the cops fault for clocking me speeding" defense. Let me know how that works out for you.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:44 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
It's funny how they opened the investigation back up because of draft night and Tunsil is nowhere on the NOA and 90% of the NOA was from immunity given to rival players.
Tunsil was given to them on a silver platter and they couldn't close.
Wouldn't that go against the NOA you just got?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News