Started By
Message
re: Bama's newest badarse recruiting poster... Most wins since 2010
Posted on 3/31/16 at 7:57 am to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 3/31/16 at 7:57 am to Tuscaloosa
Why not mention most wins since 2008, most national and SEC titles all time, most bowl appearances and victories all time, most all-americans all time, etc?
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:10 am to memphisplaya
quote:Also the most recruiting and cheating allegations brought against it.
Also the most losses without ever being beat.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:13 am to Rabern57
they should make one that explains how they never lose, they just beat themselves
Posted on 3/31/16 at 8:21 am to Tuscaloosa
It is kind of strange they picked 2010 and 72-10.
Why not most wins since 2009 and 86-10? That picks up the 14-0 2009 NC season.
You could even say most wins since 2008 and 98-12.
Alabama has been averaging over 12 wins a season for 8 years.
Why not most wins since 2009 and 86-10? That picks up the 14-0 2009 NC season.
You could even say most wins since 2008 and 98-12.
Alabama has been averaging over 12 wins a season for 8 years.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:17 am to Prof
quote:
Not trying to get a rise out of you but it looks like every other Bama poster with 'Most Wins' tacked onto the bottom. Also, I don't know if that's so much a recruiting poster as a poster that is made more to appeal to fans. And FTR, I'm not saying it looks bad. It just looks like a standard Bama poster.
These are the recruiting posters that get sent all over the country to high schools, targets and potential prospects. Every school does it. Bama's are just the best.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:19 am to Rabern57
quote:
Also the most recruiting and cheating allegations brought against it.
Link? TIA.
I mean, between the two programs, I can't think of any legitimate "recruiting and cheating allegations" brought against Bama since 2010. Auburn, however, had to pay lawyers big bucks to save themselves from the Cam Newton fiasco, to go along with the former players on HBO who went into detail about how they were paid.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:28 am to Tuscaloosa
Google it. Bama has had everything that has happened at about any school that been punished in the last 15 years. Cars, paid for signing jerseys, rental cars, loans from coaches, agents, boosters getting disassociated for his interaction with players, etc. Don't act like you haven't seen it all over the news everytime something new pops up. If the NCAA didn't have Emmert and had the balls they did in the SMU days, Bama would never have a football team again and Saban would be coaching peewee.
Most of that came from the players and booster. Not paid explorers to say stuff or rival coaches.
Most of that came from the players and booster. Not paid explorers to say stuff or rival coaches.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 10:31 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:30 am to Rabern57
How many major NCAA investigations have there been? How many times have we lawyered up to protect ourselves against those claims - which have mostly originated on opposing fanbases message boards? TIA.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:33 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
TIA.
Stop saying TIA. Thanks in advance
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:34 am to Tuscaloosa
You don't have to when you have you coach's ex-partner in crime policing him. It's like making a gang leader the police chief and wondering why his ex gang members stopped getting put in jail.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 10:38 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:35 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
frick off. TIA.
RA'd, TIA
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:35 am to Rabern57
Oh, okay. Tell your friends at ITAT and AUfamily the SEC Rant says hello.
We enjoy your victim complex and conspiracy theories very much. Big bad bammer is always just trying to keep little brother down, aren't we?
We enjoy your victim complex and conspiracy theories very much. Big bad bammer is always just trying to keep little brother down, aren't we?
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 10:36 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:37 am to Tuscaloosa
It isn't nice to call yourself names but I accept your apology
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:38 am to elposter
quote:
It is kind of strange they picked 2010 and 72-10.
Not entirely. One of the biggest stories in sports right now is the Warriors quest to go 73-9 and top the Bulls mark of 72-10 from '95-96. All of the talk is how 72 wins is so rare. I'm sure that from a marketing standpoint they decided this was a good wave to ride to help with Brand lift and recall.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:39 am to rockiee
quote:
Only 72....pathetic
Agreed. If Bert can eat more donuts in one sitting than your win total, then it is not that impressive.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 10:41 am to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
Agreed. If Bert can eat more donuts in one sitting than your win total, then it is not that impressive.
What? He never made it past 70. Don't create lies to fit your agenda.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News