Started By
Message
2004 USC vs Any of the last 4 Bama Title Teams
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:07 pm
Sorry if Germans but how does the 2004 USC Title team stack up against any of the last 4 Bama title teams?
Not trolling, just wanted tRants views.
Not trolling, just wanted tRants views.
14
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:08 pm to LSUTigers9458
odd question...why did you pick 04 USC?
IMO, they'd run roughshod through 09 and 15. 04 USC would beat 12 but it'd be close.
11 I have no idea, that team was really, really damn good.
IMO, they'd run roughshod through 09 and 15. 04 USC would beat 12 but it'd be close.
11 I have no idea, that team was really, really damn good.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:09 pm to LSUTigers9458
Media called that team the GOAT. I like Saban in the underdog role.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:09 pm to WG_Dawg
Picked them since they were likely the most dominant and talented team in the BCS era IMO
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:14 pm to LSUTigers9458
Lack of a running QB is good for Bama. Saban could probably find a way to split the games.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:14 pm to LSUTigers9458
quote:
Picked them since they were likely the most dominant and talented team in the BCS era IMO
that'd be 01 miami, but still some good food for thought.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:14 pm to genro
I don't see this years Bama team beating 04 USC just because Coker wouldn't have been able to do alot with that defense but the 2011 or 2012 team with McCarron I believe wouldve been real close.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:14 pm to LSUTigers9458
2004 USC was not that good. They were solid, but nowhere near the team people make them out to be. Christ, that team is so overblown, and all thanks to a shitty Oklahoma team.
Unranked Stanford was up on them 28-17 at halftime, they struggled with California, unranked Oregon State was up on them 13-7 at halftime, and they needed 5 field goals to put away unranked UCLA.
Unranked Stanford was up on them 28-17 at halftime, they struggled with California, unranked Oregon State was up on them 13-7 at halftime, and they needed 5 field goals to put away unranked UCLA.
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:15 pm to LSUTigers9458
Another pointless hypothetical.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:16 pm to JaboStokes
Seems like the entire front page of the SEC Rant is as well...
Pot meet kettle...
Pot meet kettle...
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:16 pm to AUbagman
quote:
2004 USC was not that good.
they went wire to wire #1. They were pretty good...
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:17 pm to LSUTigers9458
What was their conference competition like in 04?
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:17 pm to LSUTigers9458
Leinert would have been a sitting duck against any of those defenses, but especially '11 and '15.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:19 pm to WG_Dawg
Easy to do with their schedule. See my edit above.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:21 pm to LSUTigers9458
Not so subtle trolling by another butt-hurt LSU fan.
2004 USC was stripped of their championship and forced to forfeit the last two games including the Orange Bowl, and all of the 2005 games. Op seems to be trying to imply Alabama's four latest championships are going to suffer a similar fate. LOLSU.
The irony is Auburn could have been NC that year had USC been caught sooner. Two good things happened then... USC was put under sanctions and the kept the farmers from a NC.
LSU fans cannot help themselves when it come to Alabama. They are compelled to try to denigrate their daddy like squawking brat-teenagers.
2004 USC was stripped of their championship and forced to forfeit the last two games including the Orange Bowl, and all of the 2005 games. Op seems to be trying to imply Alabama's four latest championships are going to suffer a similar fate. LOLSU.
The irony is Auburn could have been NC that year had USC been caught sooner. Two good things happened then... USC was put under sanctions and the kept the farmers from a NC.
LSU fans cannot help themselves when it come to Alabama. They are compelled to try to denigrate their daddy like squawking brat-teenagers.
This post was edited on 1/15/16 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:22 pm to AUbagman
quote:
they struggled with California
Cal was very good that year. That was when they had Rodgers and Lynch on the team.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:23 pm to Eric Nies Grind Time
The point of my post was that 2004 USC is not some legendary team that some make them out to be.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:24 pm to LSUTigers9458
would be good games but I think USC's style of offense would very much play right into the hands of the bama D.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:27 pm to LSUTigers9458
Pro style offense isn't beating Bama without an elite defense, and even then it's close.
Posted on 1/15/16 at 2:27 pm to Jacknola
Just encouraging discussion bud, no trolling as posted beforehand. You guys have been dominant the past 7 years. I even said the 2011 and 2012 teams would probably beat 2004 USC so again, I'm not understanding your subtle troll comment.
I was actually putting you guys in the discussion as one of if not the greatest team of the last decade or so. Does that constitute trolling?
I'm also deeply sorry you have to feel so insecure about your recent titles.
I was actually putting you guys in the discussion as one of if not the greatest team of the last decade or so. Does that constitute trolling?
I'm also deeply sorry you have to feel so insecure about your recent titles.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News