Started By
Message

re: Who wants Richt Fired

Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:49 pm to
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33191 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Sony may be a good RB but he is no Chubb.

Let me understand you correctly.

Are you saying that if Chubb had played the entire game then we still would have lost?


Kind of like the dropoff from Gurley to Chubb. Its just not a big one in terms of production. I dont think Chubb would have outperformed Sony's performance by any meaningful amount, and again, he didnt play D.
Posted by LewDawg
Member since May 2009
75242 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

he didnt play D.
Nobody did. Hiyo!
Posted by WorkinDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
9341 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Kind of like the dropoff from Gurley to Chubb. Its just not a big one in terms of production. I dont think Chubb would have outperformed Sony's performance by any meaningful amount, and again, he didnt play D.


One thing I'll say on this topic is our game plan almost certainly included Chubb pounding the rock, SM in the slot mixing things up. Both took a step backwards when Chubb went out...my $.02.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 10/12/15 at 9:58 pm to
quote:


Kind of like the dropoff from Gurley to Chubb. Its just not a big one in terms of production. I dont think Chubb would have outperformed Sony's performance by any meaningful amount, and again, he didnt play D.


You've got to be kidding.

Chubb is Heisman material. Sony isn't.

Chubb wouldn't have had to play D if he could have played O for the entire game.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter