Started By
Message
Posted on 9/12/15 at 9:43 pm to Wtodd
If it enrages us when Mauk makes those gun slinger mistakes it has to enrage the coaches. He is two of those mistakes away in a big game from getting replaced.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 9:52 pm to BurgTiger
Yea but we loved that shite 2 yrs ago didn't we?
Posted on 9/12/15 at 9:57 pm to Wtodd
Mauk does stupid shite. Just his thing.
However, without his legs we do not win this game.
Our offense is atrocious. We simply can not run the football when we have to.
However, without his legs we do not win this game.
Our offense is atrocious. We simply can not run the football when we have to.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 9:58 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Jesus
You need a drink too
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:04 pm to JesusQuintana
If we put Lock in can the o-line keep him upright? If not does Lock have escape ability?
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:06 pm to MIZ ZOU RESPECT
quote:
If we put Lock in can the o-line keep him upright? If not does Lock have escape ability?
I don't think Lock runs as well as Mauk but that also means he won't run backwards 15 yards like Mauk does. Seriously though, I think Lock knows how to step UP in a pocket better.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:08 pm to reedus23
Does our o-line know how to make a pocket?
This post was edited on 9/12/15 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:09 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Yea but we loved that shite 2 yrs ago didn't we?
2 years ago we thought the half of his game that is shite might be fixed..
we were wrong.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:14 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
JesusQuintana
quote:
I've had several. Trust me
My man!!
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:15 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
Jagd Tiger
With exception of 3 or 4 plays what would YOU change?
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:19 pm to Wtodd
quote:
With exception of 3 or 4 plays what would YOU change?
Are you talking Mauk specifically?
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:21 pm to reedus23
Yep
Without Maty we don't win the East 2 years in a row
Without Maty we don't win the East 2 years in a row
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:23 pm to Wtodd
Don't know but don't disagree either. Probably is right.
As far as Mauk, I don't know that anyone can change it. He's refused to take coaching/training. He just is what he is at this point and we'll win more than we lose but none of them will be pretty.
As far as Mauk, I don't know that anyone can change it. He's refused to take coaching/training. He just is what he is at this point and we'll win more than we lose but none of them will be pretty.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:26 pm to reedus23
quote:
He's refused to take coaching/train
Look at the first game and this one.....major difference. With the exception of 1 pass (I think) everything was short to mid yardage.
Right or wrong?
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:27 pm to Wtodd
frick pretty...I'll take an ugly win vs a pretty loss
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:28 pm to Wtodd
quote:
With exception of 3 or 4 plays what would YOU change?
you mean 8 or 9 plays, he threw down field well except for a few horrid down field throws, he ran well except for the several times he ran backwards and barely escaped without a grounding flag, the rest of his game when he isn't handing off is mostly garbage.
he's NOT the only problem of course, he still can't read the D, see over the middle and our staff seems to have no clue how to get the play in w/out running out the play clock.
This post was edited on 9/12/15 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 9/12/15 at 10:30 pm to Jagd Tiger
Agree & my bad several under throws...forgot about those
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News