Started By
Message
Posted on 7/16/15 at 11:20 am to rmnldr
Fair. But I was younger for those and didn't understand football like I do now.
Look, Chavis is great at what he does. Wonderful DC all around. He is a terrible recruiter, and managed to utilize the players that other coaches recruited. It worked well for us to an extent.
The point I was making is that LSU has proven it can win without him. For folks to call it "slightly better recruiting" is hysterical, and they clearly don't follow recruiting; at least LSU recruiting. We are clearly recruiting much better with Steele and O at the moment, without O even having a year under his belt at LSU to prove what he can with a line.
A&M came out great and LSU came out great. Not being a homer. I have full confidence Steele can utilize the talent LSU has on defense. Numerous future 1st round picks on this D.
Look, Chavis is great at what he does. Wonderful DC all around. He is a terrible recruiter, and managed to utilize the players that other coaches recruited. It worked well for us to an extent.
The point I was making is that LSU has proven it can win without him. For folks to call it "slightly better recruiting" is hysterical, and they clearly don't follow recruiting; at least LSU recruiting. We are clearly recruiting much better with Steele and O at the moment, without O even having a year under his belt at LSU to prove what he can with a line.
A&M came out great and LSU came out great. Not being a homer. I have full confidence Steele can utilize the talent LSU has on defense. Numerous future 1st round picks on this D.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)