Started By
Message
re: I wonder why nobody believes AU on the Rashaan Evans bio hack?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:29 am to Govt Tide
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:29 am to Govt Tide
quote:
Why not just admit a simple mistake was made and quit acting like you are incapable of ever doing anything wrong?
You should start a new thread...As The Plains Get Hacked....that's right up your alley.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:31 am to Govt Tide
Still waiting on proof that Au was not hacked...
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:32 am to parkjas2001
quote:
Still waiting on proof that Au was not hacked..
I hope he makes a flow chart.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:33 am to Govt Tide
quote:
Yes. The word "hack" implies that some devious outside source was responsible.
Did you know, words have more than one definition or meaning. But in this case, you are somewhat correct in this incident. Would this have ever made it to the public eye and a secondary if some
quote:
outside source {wasn't] responsible.
quote:
Why not just admit a simple mistake was made and quit acting like you are incapable of ever doing anything wrong? It amounts to nothing in the scheme of things so I don't know why it's that hard to admit a mistake.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 10:35 am
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:33 am to parkjas2001
Proof of hack? Since they say they were. Out the hacker.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:35 am to crimsonian
If the NCAA hasn't told them they have to, why would they? Just simply fix the mistake and move on... It's not that big of a deal.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:35 am to crimsonian
quote:
Proof of hack? Since they say they were. Out the hacker.
reading comprehension bro, use it
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:36 am to crimsonian
People seem to think hacking is some super intense takeover of websites.
A hack can be as simple as accessing web pages that a website does not want public yet. Auburn had queued up info pages for all possible commits that day. The only way you could view Evans page was to enter in the exact URL, which someone did and took a screenshot of. It was dumb on AU's part and they reported it. End of story
A hack can be as simple as accessing web pages that a website does not want public yet. Auburn had queued up info pages for all possible commits that day. The only way you could view Evans page was to enter in the exact URL, which someone did and took a screenshot of. It was dumb on AU's part and they reported it. End of story
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:36 am to parkjas2001
I don't think there's an official guide to lay people's adoption of computer slang, but I believe there's a fairly common understanding of "hack" that must involve a person intentionally attempting to access a secured "area" (database, site, application, what have you.) Typing in a URL that is in a public environment but not advertised to the general public is not a hack.
This is no way refutes the current standing argument of "Who gives a frick?"
This is no way refutes the current standing argument of "Who gives a frick?"
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:37 am to crimsonian
quote:
Out the hacker.
handled internally...he wont be hacking again soon.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:38 am to Crimson Legend
quote:
I don't think there's an official guide to lay people's adoption of computer slang, but I believe there's a fairly common understanding of "hack" that must involve a person intentionally attempting to access a secured "area" (database, site, application, what have you.) Typing in a URL that is in a public environment but not advertised to the general public is not a hack.
except it has evolved into much more than that. Hack is used quite routinely as a workaround with tech. Hell even more than that, you hear quite regularly with everyday stuff, ie "life hacks" etc..
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:39 am to parkjas2001
Shitty media then, since they said they were hacked by the media.
I'm sure you can internally handle the media. Do you think your writers being moved around had anything to do with it?
I'm sure you can internally handle the media. Do you think your writers being moved around had anything to do with it?
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 10:44 am
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:39 am to parkjas2001
mother of god this thread has to be a candidate for some award.
this thread........wow
this thread........wow
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:44 am to crimsonian
A computer science degree from AU is worthless.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:45 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
except it has evolved into much more than that. Hack is used quite routinely as a workaround with tech
Not in the corporate IT world where I work. A "workaround" is finding a technical (or process) solution to an issue with an application, site, etc. A "hack" is when someone successfully attempts to access a secured area.
That being said, it's a fine line where a misuse of a term eventually becomes its generally accepted meaning. The term "hack" among the general public means whatever people think it means. The one point at issue is whether this was the result of a bug, process error, etc. or an intentional manipulation of the site from outside.
That will be critical to determining whether the NCAA ignores this, or considers typing a sentence somewhere pointlessly documenting a minor infraction, and THEN ignoring it.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:51 am to crimsonian
quote:
Shitty media then, since they said they were hacked by the media.
No kidding. Next thing you know they will manipulate photos to make Saban look taller than his opponents.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:52 am to parkjas2001
I know, but didn't know AU could internally handle the media.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:52 am to crimsonian
quote:
didn't know AU could internally handle the media.
Learn something new everyday.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 10:53 am to parkjas2001
Some here would say that is easy for me.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News