Started By
Message
re: Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:08 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:08 am to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
He' talking about the embryology renderings of Ernst Haeckel
LINK
Most recent additions of biology texts don't contain them, and the ones who do do so for historical purposes and say they are no longer considered valid.
It's a red herring that creationists use to "discredit" evolution, not realizing in their ignorance that nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them.
LINK
Most recent additions of biology texts don't contain them, and the ones who do do so for historical purposes and say they are no longer considered valid.
It's a red herring that creationists use to "discredit" evolution, not realizing in their ignorance that nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them.
1
Posted on 4/14/14 at 11:26 am to Roger Klarvin
[quote]It's a red herring that creationists use to "discredit" evolution, not realizing in their ignorance that nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them.[/quote
First they are introduced as "evidence of evolution" now "nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them" ....classic darwinistic tactic ...the "evidence" of evolution is chock full of speculative conjecture and outright falsification
First they are introduced as "evidence of evolution" now "nothing in evolutionary theory is based on them" ....classic darwinistic tactic ...the "evidence" of evolution is chock full of speculative conjecture and outright falsification
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News