Started By
Message
re: Auburn May Add National Championships
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:53 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:53 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
well there is a big difference between the two, Ill let you be the judge
The only difference is '41 Alabama didn't win their conference. They still went to a major bowl (the Cotton Bowl) and won it. While you'd think on the surface that a conference championship is a big deal, 2011 Alabama proves this is not the case.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:54 pm to RollTide1987
quote:I think that is the entire point being made. AU is considering not limiting themselves to just major poll championships because the teams that they are compared to don't either.
because not a single one of the teams you mentioned above (1941 Alabama included) finished #1 in a major poll.
I wouldn't do it if I were making the call, but I don't really care one way or the other.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:55 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
I'm glad LSU is above this bs.
Y'all should claim 1908. The NCAA says it's good.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:58 pm to WDE24
quote:
AU is considering not limiting themselves to just major poll championships because the teams that they are compared to don't either.
Which is why I am fine with Auburn wanting to add 1910, 1913, and 1914. Those make plenty of sense in the grand scheme of things. But to include 1958, 1983, 1993, and 2004 just because Alabama claims ONE non-legit title in the poll era is simply asinine.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:59 pm to WDE24
quote:
I think that is the entire point being made. AU is considering not limiting themselves to just major poll championships because the teams that they are compared to don't either.
I wouldn't do it if I were making the call, but I don't really care one way or the other.
Here's the problem though. As bad as the 41 claim is for Alabama, they still got a selection. Y'all didn't get a single one in 1910, 14, 58, or 2004.
Starts on page 74.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 2:59 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
The only difference is '41 Alabama didn't win their conference.
close, but still not there.
hint think about why yall claimed "rose bowl titles"
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:00 pm to Korin
quote:
Korin
quote:
Here's the problem though. As bad as the 41 claim is for Alabama, they still got a selection. Y'all didn't get a single one in 1910, 14, 58, or 2004.
Starts on page 74.
sorry you are still having a hard time grasping
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:01 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
close, but still not there.
hint think about why yall claimed "rose bowl titles"
The Rose was the only bowl game until 1934.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:02 pm to RollTide1987
quote:First, it isn't just Bama, but I don't understand why it is asinine.
But to include 1958, 1983, 1993, and 2004 just because Alabama claims ONE non-legit title in the poll era is simply asinine.
Here, AU is simply deciding whether to "officially" claim championships that have already been awarded to them the same way other program, including Bama, have.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:03 pm to Korin
quote:
Here's the problem though. As bad as the 41 claim is for Alabama, they still got a selection. Y'all didn't get a single one in 1910, 14, 58, or 2004.
quote:
All were recognized as national champions by at least one national selector, which are used by other schools to recognize National Championships.
Nice alter btw.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:03 pm to WDE24
quote:
Here, AU is simply deciding whether to "officially" claim championships that have already been awarded to them the same way other program, including Bama, have.
If that's the case then Alabama can go ahead and claim 1937, 1966, 1975, 1977, 1991, and 1994 to the list of championships they could claim. Alabama could claim as many as 27 but only claims 15.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:05 pm to RollTide1987
either way if you do it you go Bammer
welcome to the club again
welcome to the club again
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:05 pm to RollTide1987
quote:Are you sure? They were awarded championships by a national selector that other schools use to claim Championships?
If that's the case then Alabama can go ahead and claim 1937, 1966, 1975, 1977, 1991, and 1994 to the list of championships they could claim.
If so, I suppose they could. I suspect you are just saying that because another poster said so and you don't really know.
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:06 pm to Korin
quote:
The Rose was the only bowl game until 1934.
good god, you need to read up before you start posting
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:07 pm to WDE24
quote:
They were awarded championships by a national selector that other schools use to claim Championships?
How many schools claim the New York Times as their soul reason for awarding themselves a national championship? How many legit selectors awarded Auburn the national championship in 1993 and 2004?
If these were legitimate national selectors, Auburn would have awarded themselves these championships years ago. The same goes for Alabama with the years I listed above.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to RollTide1987
They got 1 selection in 93 (National Championship Foundation). They got none in 04.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to RollTide1987
quote:Umm...this title is recognized by the NCAA already. Did you even read the article in the OP?
How many legit selectors awarded Auburn the national championship in 1993?
If these were legitimate national selectors, Auburn would have awarded themselves these championships years ago.
quote:
1993: Finished 11-0. Outscored opponents 353-192. Recognized national champion by four selectors including National Championship Foundation. Recognized by the NCAA.
This post was edited on 1/31/14 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to NYCAuburn
RED HEADED STEP CHILD YOU WILL ALWAYS BE, YOU WILL.
YODA.......
YODA.......
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:10 pm to Korin
quote:4.
They got 1 selection in 93 (National Championship Foundation).
Why the alter? What happened to the other account?
Posted on 1/31/14 at 3:11 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
good god, you need to read up before you start posting
Your hook is REALLY showing now.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News