This is dumb. Obviously the SECCG adds a quality game to the schedule. But it takes away an apples-to-apples comparison of the regular season schedules.

quote:
they are going to be much better than when yall play them next week

And this is dumb too. It's week 5 at the end of Sept., not week 1.

This post was edited on 9/18/13 at 11:08 am

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by gnarkill1529

Alabama

Member since Jun 2011

4639 posts

Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:08 am to LSUJuice

so essentially your playing one game that is definitely tougher than what we play...and all off season we heard how shitty bama's schedule was...looks like LSU's schedule is just as shitty

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by gnarkill1529

Alabama

Member since Jun 2011

4639 posts

Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:09 am to LSUJuice

quote:
And this is dumb too. It's week 5 at the end of Sept., not week 1.

have you ever played football?...the teams who continually get better are usually playing longer than the ones who don't

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by tider04

North Carolina

Member since Oct 2007

5606 posts

Posted on 9/18/13 at 11:12 am to LSUJuice

quote:
This is dumb. Obviously the SECCG adds a quality game to the schedule. But it takes away an apples-to-apples comparison of the regular season schedules.

Your'e missing the point. At the end of the season (not end of regular season), that's when your schedule is judged. So, just like last season when we played UGA and ND in the post-season--those wins count towards out SOS. So if Bama does run the table this year, they will have to beat 6 quality teams and several mediocre teams like AU to do it. Which completely smashes the silly LSU argument this off-season that Bama might win it again because they don't play anyone. With TCU looking like a 6-6 team and UF not much better, it is very possible Bama ends up with a tougher schedule than LSU this year. Fact. DWI.