Started By
Message
re: Manziel recommendation from NCAA on Wednesday
Posted on 8/27/13 at 4:01 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 8/27/13 at 4:01 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
They have no tangible evidence though
I don't care about John Football, but you take it over the top every time.
If three people saying he took money isn't (EDITED) enough evidence, what do you think qualifies? Or do you think that the NCAA has to have bank records and checks which they couldn't get even if they exist because they can't subpoena.
This post was edited on 8/27/13 at 4:14 pm
4
Posted on 8/27/13 at 4:03 pm to therick711
quote:
If three people saying he took money isn't tangible evidence, what do you think qualifies?
Hopefully three people never accuse you of rape
Posted on 8/27/13 at 4:04 pm to therick711
quote:
If three people saying he took money isn't tangible evidence, what do you think qualifies? Or do you think that the NCAA has to have bank records and checks which they couldn't get even if they exist because they can't subpoena.
That's just it. Which 3 people? Who are they? JFF and A&M have a right to know who accused him. Who are you referring to?
Posted on 8/27/13 at 4:04 pm to therick711
quote:
If three people saying he took money isn't tangible evidence, what do you think qualifies?
In all seriousness though, this:
quote:
If three people saying he took money isn't tangible evidence, what do you think qualifies?
Is one of the most idiotic things I've seen posted about the Manziel saga.
Posted on 8/27/13 at 4:05 pm to therick711
No paper trail you say?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News