Started By
Message

re: Posted without comment (Texas AD takes shot at Missouri)

Posted on 2/12/13 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 2/12/13 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

The university of texas wants a tuition hike, but sits on 2/3 of the PUF. There is no reason AT ALL for that university to EVER need a tuition hike. In fact, it should be FREE. The 2/3 revenues from the PUF cover well more than net operating costs. That's the real issue.


A little education is alway helpful - let me refer you to this document: LINK
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
81611 posts
Posted on 2/12/13 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Big12fan


Irony = Having a username implying being a fan of an entire conference...one in which your chosen school has almost singlehandedly rendered mediocre in almost all sports.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8718 posts
Posted on 2/12/13 at 4:34 pm to
Perry wants to use the PUF for more things though as does A&M. Texas wants to keep the PUF money limited on what it can be spent on. That doc is for the Orange and Maroon Day which is essentially when Aggies and sips link hands and go to the Leg to push for the issues we BOTH agree on. My Dad has been involved with it for many, many years. How PUF money is spent is not an issue we agree on.

The PUF is exploding right now because of increased production and we are mining more rare earth minerals out of the land than ever. At the same time the price of all of those commodities is only going up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter