Started By
Message
re: Chizik worth more than '10 Sabans,' Auburn's Pat Dye says
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:28 am to genro
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:28 am to genro
I thought the argument was that Saban's success wasn't as impressive as Bryant's because Bryant established UA as a championship contender year in and year out, and the fan base/administration wouldn't accept less.
Then bama fans came in saying Alabama was already established before bryant and auburn fans said nuh uh and then people started arguing over Mobile and Birmingham or some shite I dunno. Or was that another thread?
Then bama fans came in saying Alabama was already established before bryant and auburn fans said nuh uh and then people started arguing over Mobile and Birmingham or some shite I dunno. Or was that another thread?
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:31 am to Tiguar
quote:
nuh uh
Always wondered how to spell that. But it's not a (Big Word)
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:32 am to Tiguar
quote:It was.
I thought the argument was that Saban's success wasn't as impressive as Bryant's because Bryant established UA as a championship contender year in and year out, and the fan base/administration wouldn't accept less.
quote:This has been proven, sourced, and linked..
Then bama fans came in saying Alabama was already established before bryant
quote:Diddy said Bama had an advantage because it was near B'ham. Someone pointed out that Auburn is near the gump. It devolved into a B-ham vs. Gump discussion for awhile.
then people started arguing over Mobile and Birmingham or some shite I dunno.
There's my explanation. The whole thread is retarded. Seriously
anyone who thinks the gump is better than Birmingham is a fricking retard.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)