Started By
Message

re: Chizik worth more than '10 Sabans,' Auburn's Pat Dye says

Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:28 am to
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:28 am to
I thought the argument was that Saban's success wasn't as impressive as Bryant's because Bryant established UA as a championship contender year in and year out, and the fan base/administration wouldn't accept less.

Then bama fans came in saying Alabama was already established before bryant and auburn fans said nuh uh and then people started arguing over Mobile and Birmingham or some shite I dunno. Or was that another thread?
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105584 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:30 am to
pretty much
Posted by troywew
Member since Nov 2010
2510 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:31 am to
quote:

nuh uh


Always wondered how to spell that. But it's not a (Big Word)
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 9:32 am to
quote:

I thought the argument was that Saban's success wasn't as impressive as Bryant's because Bryant established UA as a championship contender year in and year out, and the fan base/administration wouldn't accept less.
It was.
quote:

Then bama fans came in saying Alabama was already established before bryant
This has been proven, sourced, and linked..
quote:

then people started arguing over Mobile and Birmingham or some shite I dunno.
Diddy said Bama had an advantage because it was near B'ham. Someone pointed out that Auburn is near the gump. It devolved into a B-ham vs. Gump discussion for awhile.

There's my explanation. The whole thread is retarded. Seriously
















anyone who thinks the gump is better than Birmingham is a fricking retard.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter