Started By
Message
re: NCAA Regional host sites (no host for Kentucky)
Posted on 5/27/12 at 3:38 pm to jcole4lsu
Posted on 5/27/12 at 3:38 pm to jcole4lsu
If they're willing to play you in OOC.
Of course Miami didn't travel in their OOC either so where's the knock on them?
But this once again goes back to the age old question in multiple sports for SEC schools. Why should the OOC weigh so much when your conference is top in the country? Why not acknowledge the full body of work (which for UK was good enough to host IMO).
It's all just finely dressed bullshite to try to limit SEC dominance.
Of course Miami didn't travel in their OOC either so where's the knock on them?
But this once again goes back to the age old question in multiple sports for SEC schools. Why should the OOC weigh so much when your conference is top in the country? Why not acknowledge the full body of work (which for UK was good enough to host IMO).
It's all just finely dressed bullshite to try to limit SEC dominance.
2
Posted on 5/27/12 at 3:42 pm to BluegrassBelle
Next year you guys better travel to the intensely HOSTILE crowd at Minnesota!
Posted on 5/27/12 at 3:45 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Why not acknowledge the full body of work (which for UK was good enough to host IMO).
This depends on who got the host site over UK, imo. Was Miami ever expressly mentioned as the final host site?
There are a lot of factors that go into hosting other than record/rpi.
quote:
It's all just finely dressed bullshite to try to limit SEC dominance.
I would view it as an effort by the ncaa to grow the game. The outcomes are the same but the intent isnt to specifically hurt the sec.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News