Started By
Message
re: Why do teams in LA, AL, FL, GA, TX have an easier time recruiting?
Posted on 2/2/12 at 2:10 pm to auisssa
Posted on 2/2/12 at 2:10 pm to auisssa
quote:
You really don't think tradition matters in CFB in regards to recruiting?
it is way down the list of things that matter
otherwise notre dame would always be near the top of the list instead of struggling to find guys that want to go there
Saban goes to LSU - LSU shoots to the top of the SEC recruiting heap. Mack Brown goes to Texas - Texas starts out recruiting OU, Nebraska, etc
It is mostly about the guy doing your recruiting and the location of the school IMO
Posted on 2/2/12 at 2:13 pm to molsusports
quote:
Why do teams in LA, AL, FL, GA, TX have an easier time recruiting?
In case you haven't noticed, football is a religion in the South.
This post was edited on 2/2/12 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 2/2/12 at 2:14 pm to molsusports
And I would say that will always be easier to recruit at Texas, Alabama, OSU, USC, Michigan, Penn State, Notre Dame, etc.
Those programs don't stay down for long. Shula constantly got top 20 recruiting clases at Alabama (better than Arky is getting now with Petrino) and he wasn't a good coach or recruiter.
And LSU/Texas were getting plenty of good recruits before Saban/Brown showed up.
Those programs don't stay down for long. Shula constantly got top 20 recruiting clases at Alabama (better than Arky is getting now with Petrino) and he wasn't a good coach or recruiter.
And LSU/Texas were getting plenty of good recruits before Saban/Brown showed up.
This post was edited on 2/2/12 at 2:19 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)