Started By
Message
Posted on 1/8/12 at 4:58 pm to Teague
quote:
I have absolutely nothing against him. I just think a lot of LSU fans are stupid, but to be fair, every fanbase has them.
So he's overrated based on your personal distaste for LSU fans? That's a real fair way to evaluate the player. I think Rekrul hit it on the money. You don't like him. I get that. I didn't like Tebow. Doesn't change the fact that he was a great player and if he played for LSU I would love the guy. Personal distaste as a rating tool doesn't get the job done.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 4:59 pm to Teague
quote:
I have absolutely nothing against him. I just think a lot of LSU fans are stupid, but to be fair, every fanbase has them.
What are lsu fans being stupid about here in this thread? Because bama fans are the ones making themselves look football stupid calling Mathieu overrated. You know damn well that you would take a player like Mathieu on your team. Bama doesn't have a play maker and game changer on Mathieu's level. That is for damn sure.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:00 pm to Teague
I agree that there are stupid fans in every fanbase, but come on. Is every sportswriter that gets a Heisman vote stupid? The kid was invited to NY for a reason, as a Sophomore. How can you just ignore that fact?
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:01 pm to Teague
quote:
I have absolutely nothing against him. I just think a lot of Alabama fans are stupid, but to be fair, every fanbase has them.
switch one word and it works for Updyke.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:03 pm to therick711
quote:
So he's overrated based on your personal distaste for LSU fans?
Holy frick.
NO. He's overrated for the reasons I've mentioned. LSU fans are too stupid to see it.
Are you following now?
I don't have anything against him. He's a good player. He's not as good as many of you guys think. Wait and watch his numbers plummet next year.
He's forced a lot of fumbles, kudos. He has a lot of tackles, which comes partly from the position he's playing and also he's a good player. He's not great in coverage. The end. I don't have to think he's spectacular. You don't have to base your own self worth on what I think of your team or players. It's ok to be happy with what YOU think.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:03 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
I would love to know what you were watching this year if you didn't think he deserved it. Mathieu is the definition of a true game changer and MVP. You are showing ignorance if you can't see that.
They watched him all year, they know what he is capable of, an know he is deserving. Anyone and everyone knows the Bama fan base would not be happy unless all contenders were from Bama. They didn't feel Andrew Luck deserved it either. They are THE most delusional fan base hands down. Why is this surprising??
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:04 pm to BeeFense5
If you meant Matthieu was inferior to Arenas, statistically speaking, then you are right. More int for TDs for Javy and three times the punt returns for TDs.
Were you referring to punt return average?
Were you referring to punt return average?
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:07 pm to Teague
So just ignore the fact that he was a Heisman finalist? Yeah I thought you would, you're calling LSU fans stupid but it's obvious that you're the only stupid one here. Just leave the thread because you're only making yourself look like a bigger fool every time you post.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:08 pm to TroyTider
quote:
TroyTider
You thinking that arenas is better than Mathieu is absolutely hilarious.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:08 pm to Teague
quote:
The end. I don't have to think he's spectacular. You don't have to base your own self worth on what I think of your team or players. It's ok to be happy with what YOU think.
I don't. I DO, however, base my opinion that you know nothing of football on the fact that you say "he isn't good in coverage" and can't articulate a single basis for that opinion. You don't have to think he's spectacular, but conclusory statements of his shortcomings show your lack of knowledge and objectivity.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:10 pm to therick711
quote:
the fact that you say "he isn't good in coverage" and can't articulate a single basis for that opinion.
Here, I'll articulate a basis for that opinion:
He gets beaten by WR's.
Is that good enough, or do you actually think I'm going to go back through all of LSU's game film and point out each instance to you?
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:12 pm to Teague
quote:
Is that good enough, or do you actually think I'm going to go back through all of LSU's game film and point out each instance to you?
No it isn't. I wouldn't trust you to do it anyway because you obviously have no idea what the hell you are talking about. You know who else gets "beat by WR's [sic]"?
Everyone. I thought you would have something good to offer, it turned out you are just another delusional homer who equates disliking a kid personally as him being overrated. Sad, really.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:13 pm to Teague
bama got like two 15 yard catches on him and now he is horrible in coverage and Bama's WRs are better than Reuben Randle. Its cute, really.
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:14 pm to Teague
quote:
He gets beaten by WR's.
Really? A corner getting beaten by WR's? That's revolutionary shite right there my friend. Even Deion fricking Sanders got beaten by plenty of WR's in his day
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:18 pm to Teague
I have seen your DB's get absolutely torched by randle a few times. That must mean they are not good in coverage.
This post was edited on 1/8/12 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:19 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
I have seen your DB's get absolutely torched by randle a few times. That must mean they are not good in coverage.
and therefore, overrated.
QED
/Teague-likedelusion
Posted on 1/8/12 at 5:33 pm to BeeFense5
Since when do Bama fans hate TM7? I like him.
Posted on 1/10/12 at 11:46 am to Rekrul
Is he still the greatest ever, or is he maybe not great in coverage, as most knowledgeable fans agreed?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News