Started By
Message
re: SI: Why Alabama, Not Oklahoma, Should be #1
Posted on 5/25/11 at 12:09 pm to eric4UA08
Posted on 5/25/11 at 12:09 pm to eric4UA08
quote:
:inb4ahighschoolfreshmancouldbetheqbandwewouldstillwinour42878thnationalchampionship:
reach.
Not when a poster just said this: "All Bama needs from a redshirt sophomore QB is not to lose the game. With TR at RB and the OL, Bama shouldn't need the QB to win games for them."
3
Posted on 5/25/11 at 12:10 pm to Tiger Authority
That pretty much sounds like the formula used in 2008 and 2009.
Posted on 5/25/11 at 12:12 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Not when a poster just said this: "All Bama needs from a redshirt sophomore QB is not to lose the game. With TR at RB and the OL, Bama shouldn't need the QB to win games for them."
practically everyone on here said Alabama won an NC despite McElroy. So it's not impossible. I'm guessing that you're banking on LSU winning despite JJ, right?
Posted on 5/25/11 at 12:17 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Not when a poster just said this: "All Bama needs from a redshirt sophomore QB is not to lose the game. With TR at RB and the OL, Bama shouldn't need the QB to win games for them."
How is that a reach? A dominating defense and strong running game is how Bama won 14 in 2009, 12 in 2008, and 13 in 1992. Considering Bama won 2 national titles with the stars aligned that way, I'll take it every year.
This post was edited on 5/25/11 at 12:18 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News