Started By
Message
On3 Post Spring Top 25
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:07 am
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:07 am
LINK
Should be the first of many before we get the Preseason mags which usually hit the press in mid to late May.
Should be the first of many before we get the Preseason mags which usually hit the press in mid to late May.
9
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:08 am to AUTiger789
SEC Rankings:
1. Texas
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
10. Florida
12. S Carolina
13. Auburn
15. LSU
19. Ole Miss
21. Tennessee
1. Texas
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
10. Florida
12. S Carolina
13. Auburn
15. LSU
19. Ole Miss
21. Tennessee
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:11 am to AUTiger789
Also, Saturday Down South released a Post Spring SEC Power Ratings list this morning:
1. Texas
2. LSU
3. Georgia
4. Ole Miss
5. Texas A&M
6. Alabama
7. Florida
8. Oklahoma
9. Auburn
10. South Carolina
11. Missouri
12. Tennessee
13. Vanderbilt
14. Arkansas
15. Kentucky
16. Mississippi State
1. Texas
2. LSU
3. Georgia
4. Ole Miss
5. Texas A&M
6. Alabama
7. Florida
8. Oklahoma
9. Auburn
10. South Carolina
11. Missouri
12. Tennessee
13. Vanderbilt
14. Arkansas
15. Kentucky
16. Mississippi State
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:16 am to AUTiger789
To clarify, these are the rankings from the embarrassment that is Andy Staples, not On3’s rankings.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:16 am to AUTiger789
Two top 10 recruiting classes and a lot of solid players from the transfer portal have rebuilt this Auburn team.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:16 am to AUTiger789
I think DownSouthSaturdayMorning ranking looks better than On3's
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:17 am to AUTiger789
I have done zero research and know next to nothing about what teams return in 2025, so with no thought whatsoever I will say:
-ND seems way too high.
-Clemson seems too high, although they play in a weak league. I am nearly certain there are more than 2 teams in America better than them
-PSU is the same joke as always .They'll lose to Oregon and OSU but still be in the top 10
-No idea on bama. They lost 4 games and break in a new QB, but year 2 is usually a big improvement with a new coach. Who knows
-UGA seems abotu right. We've got issues but will always be top 10 with kirby
-Illiinois, SC, and AU seem too high
-Knowing nothing about them, Michigan, Tenn, and ole miss seem too low
-ND seems way too high.
-Clemson seems too high, although they play in a weak league. I am nearly certain there are more than 2 teams in America better than them
-PSU is the same joke as always .They'll lose to Oregon and OSU but still be in the top 10
-No idea on bama. They lost 4 games and break in a new QB, but year 2 is usually a big improvement with a new coach. Who knows
-UGA seems abotu right. We've got issues but will always be top 10 with kirby
-Illiinois, SC, and AU seem too high
-Knowing nothing about them, Michigan, Tenn, and ole miss seem too low
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:18 am to AUTiger789
quote:
1. Texas
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:20 am to AUTiger789
The Mizzou pick is predictably lazy. You can always figure these lazy frickers will slot Mizzou about 5 spots lower than they will finish. Clockwork. 
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:22 am to AUTiger789
quote:
Also, Saturday Down South released a Post Spring SEC Power Ratings list this morning:
How the frick do you do a power ranking for a period in which no teams play each other?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:25 am to pankReb
Banners are hung.
15-0 ship
:nana: :nana:
15-0 ship
:nana: :nana:Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:30 am to Faurot fodder
quote:
The Mizzou pick is predictably lazy. You can always figure these lazy frickers will slot Mizzou about 5 spots lower than they will finish. Clockwork.
You’ve got to be kidding.
Last season Mizzou was in most everyone’s Preseason Top 10. They absolutely did not finish close to that.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:30 am to AUTiger789
I want to know what A&M was ranked in the pre-season power rankings in 2012 and enter the season at that number.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:34 am to AUTiger789
Last season we got some pre-season pub, but every other season before that we were picked well below where we ended up.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:40 am to ColtRange
Yeah way too high.
There are questions about the offense. Whether it was Sark or QE, holding the offense back.
There are questions about the offense. Whether it was Sark or QE, holding the offense back.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:42 am to AUTiger789
Looks on point,
Posted on 4/28/25 at 10:52 am to AUTiger789
quote:
10. Florida
Posted on 4/28/25 at 11:03 am to AUTiger789
How's your head coach doing? I read he is putting off cancer surgery because of his faith and will take another look at it in January. Does prostate cancer work like that?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 11:04 am to AUTiger789
For UT, it's fair despite the fact that it's based on the wrong thing. The loss of Nico isn't going to hurt us as much as losing some key defenders and being a giant unknown at WR (which was the case last year too). I think our running game will be fine although I doubt one RB equals Sampson's load we have guys that can make up the difference.
Texas, BAMA and UGA look about right. Others I'd change around.
Texas, BAMA and UGA look about right. Others I'd change around.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 11:06 am to bamameister
Does Hugh legitimately have cancer?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News