Started By
Message
Oregon's unbeaten season so impressed CFP committee that Ducks draw the short straw
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:30 am
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:30 am
LINK
quote:
This is the College Football Playoff selection committee. Congratulations on a wonderful season and a hard-won conference championship in your first year as a Big Ten member. We are highly impressed with your 13-0 record, especially in a season where so many teams faltered along the way. And when we consider that you had to fly to the Eastern or Central time zone four times, finishing off a perfect season with a 45-37 win over fellow playoff participant Penn State Saturday night, it is truly one of the great accomplishments of the last several years.
In fact, we as a committee are so enamored with what you’ve done, Oregon, that we are going to award you the playoff’s No. 1 seed. Again, many congrats.
But here’s the thing, Coach Lanning.
In every other sport that decides championships in a tournament format, the best teams or individuals get seeded in the order they are ranked to ensure that the bracket is balanced and fair. It doesn’t always work out perfectly, but this is considered standard practice to give the highest-seeded teams the easiest theoretical path possible toward a championship. After all, that’s what they’ve earned by virtue of their regular-season accomplishments.
But never mind that. Here’s the reality of your situation. Despite all the great things you’ve done, you are not getting the easiest path as a reward for being the top team in the country. Far from it, in fact. What the committee has cooked up for you is a quarterfinal against either Ohio State, which might be the sport's most-talented and expensive roster, or a Tennessee team that is currently ranked No. 8 nationally in offense and No. 4 on defense.
In fact, if we were putting together the bracket strictly by our committee rankings, you’d never see either of these teams unless it was in the championship game. Instead, you’d be playing the winner of Boise State-Indiana in the quarterfinals. Oops!
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:33 am to Phat Phil
Great article. The format is nonsensical for every team involved.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:37 am to ManBearSharkReb
This committee is football ignorant
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:43 am to Bamafig
quote:
This committee is football ignorant
The committee just ranks the teams. It's the format that is messed up. The article bashing the committee is stupid. A group of presidents of different universities were the ones who came up with the format.
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 9:47 am
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:44 am to Phat Phil
Oregon getting fricked as the #1 seed and Texas and PSU having the easiest paths as the #5 and 6 is just retarded
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 9:45 am
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:45 am to Phat Phil
Oregon's season was impressive, but the schedule wasn't that impressive. They played 4 ranked teams, but one was Boise St. (won 37-34) and another was an Illinois team that lost to every decent team they played. I don't see why a Boise/Oregon rematch in the 2nd round would've been a fair reward.
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 9:46 am
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:47 am to Phat Phil
How the frick can someone conceivably bitch about playing good teams in a championship-deciding tournament?
What do they want the committee to do? Fill the playoff field with Rutgers, Arkansas, UAB, etc.?
What do they want the committee to do? Fill the playoff field with Rutgers, Arkansas, UAB, etc.?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:50 am to Phat Phil
But if you read the posts on these boards over the weekend, it was “oh the poor ol SEC! the committee is fricking us hard with this format” lol
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:51 am to Tornado Alley
quote:
How the frick can someone conceivably bitch about playing good teams in a championship-deciding tournament?
What do they want the committee to do? Fill the playoff field with Rutgers, Arkansas, UAB, etc.?
The committee didn't do anything wrong. They just ranked the teams. The format is dumb though. It completely undermines the entire point of having a tournament format and a seeding system.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 9:55 am to Phat Phil
If they are as good as they look, it should be an easy path to the championship game!
That looks like a middle of the season SEC gauntlet type of schedule!
And… they are getting those games on a neutral field!
That looks like a middle of the season SEC gauntlet type of schedule!
And… they are getting those games on a neutral field!
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 9:57 am
Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:03 am to Tornado Alley
quote:
What do they want the committee to do? Fill the playoff field with Rutgers, Arkansas, UAB, etc.?
Or SMU and Clemson, Arizona State and Boise…I mean, dang. Them are some strong programs with big wins over ranked opponents this year. It’s a meat grinder!
Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:05 am to Bamafig
quote:
This committee is football ignorant
It's a DEI centric committee, plain and simple.
The selection committee is comprised of DEI hires
Posted on 12/9/24 at 10:09 am to Phat Phil
quote:
In every other sport that decides championships in a tournament format, the best teams or individuals get seeded in the order they are ranked to ensure that the bracket is balanced and fair.
Not really true. In the NFL you have to win your division to qualify for a bye. The difference is there's more parity between divisions. So it's rare that the second place NFC north team would be better than the champion of the NFC south.
Not so in college. The 5th place SEC team is better than the champions of the ACC, Big 12 and every other conference besides the Big 10.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News