Started By
Message

re: Statement about the reversal

Posted on 10/21/24 at 10:06 am to
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
3293 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 10:06 am to
quote:

It’s funny how pretty much everyone disagrees with you, but keep fighting the good fight


I’m honestly just shocked how many posters can’t read. I knew the SEC wasn’t known for academics, I just didn’t think it was this bad.

I’m not arguing how it transpired. I’m arguing the idiots that keep saying “it’s not reversible” when all you have to do is read the SECs statement and it explains what happened.
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
908 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:04 am to
Texas is the new REC
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
7068 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:05 am to
quote:

it doesn’t matter what happened. You keep saying it wasn’t reversible. By rule they were able to correct their call.


Every call is reversible before the next play is snapped. Not all are reviewable, including PI.
Posted by RogerTempleton
Austin
Member since Nov 2014
3130 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:19 am to
Right call was made. All that matters.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
115219 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:33 am to
quote:

I’m not arguing how it transpired. I’m arguing the idiots that keep saying “it’s not reversible” when all you have to do is read the SECs statement and it explains what happened.


But the statement is made up. You can keep pretending it’s not. We all know it is.

Are you really unsophisticated or are you trolling?
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
2015 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 11:46 am to
quote:

You guys keep saying the call is unreversible.

It’s reversible


Everybody knows that refs pick up flags after these little ref conferences all the time. Even on non reviewable plays.

Obviously this circumstance indicates that there needs to be a more specific procedure on when and how these little ref conferences can be held in terms of calls being overturned.

I would suggest that once the ref steps off the penalty and places the ball... the call stands... no matter how egregious the call might have been.

Refs have to be in agreement before then.

Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
3293 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

But the statement is made up.


They convened and corrected the call. No matter what transpired in between the initial call and the changed call, that's what happened. The call by the rule is not "irreversible".

JFC I'm starting to think you people would forget to breathe if someone didn't remind you.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
35266 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

it doesn’t matter what happened. You keep saying it wasn’t reversible. By rule they were able to correct their call.


It was Non reviewable. They only changed it after reviewing it on the big screen. What happened led to that, so it is relevant
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
35266 posts
Posted on 10/21/24 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Obviously this circumstance indicates that there needs to be a more specific procedure on when and how these little ref conferences can be held in terms of calls being overturned. I would suggest that once the ref steps off the penalty and places the ball... the call stands... no matter how egregious the call might have been.


Here is the rule:

1. a. A penalty is completed when it is accepted, declined or canceled according to rule, or when the choice is obvious to the referee.

c. When a foul is committed, the penalty shall be completed before the ball is declared ready for play for any ensuing down.

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
41576 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 8:29 am to
quote:

It’s funny how pretty much everyone disagrees with you, but keep fighting the good fight


Remember the Alamo!
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
35266 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

penalty is completed when it is accepted, declined or canceled according to rule, or when the choice is obvious to the referee.



Its the OR that is interesting here.

The refs didn't cancel the call. UGA accepted the call.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 13Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter