Started By
Message
re: College football fans vote -- "which CFB program will be most successful next 5-10 years?"
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:37 pm to Kenny Loftin
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:37 pm to Kenny Loftin
quote:
Less all-time wins, losing record on the field Is Clemson more of a blueblood before Ohio State?
Clemson doesn’t have the consistency or historical success of LSU & UGA. They were pretty much Aggy until 10 years ago while LSU & UGA have historical and current success and did it with a lot of consistency give or take a few down years here and there. Ohio State is also in a completely different world historically and currently as Texas. Y’all aren’t close to what you think you are. Do you also think Yale, Army, & Navy are blue bloods? Because the only way you can leave LSU & UGA out while keeping teams like Texas, Nebraska and even Michigan until the last couple years in is if you’re just using ancient success and wins in 1950 to come up with the list. Congrats on being part of a list that means absolutely nothing if we go with your criteria
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 3:42 pm
3
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:48 pm to kbtigers85
quote:
Y’all aren’t close to what you think you are. Do you also think Yale, Army, & Navy are blue bloods? Because the only way you can leave LSU & UGA out while keeping teams like Texas, Nebraska and even Michigan until the last couple years in is if you’re just using ancient success and wins in 1950 to come up with the list. Congrats on being part of a list that means absolutely nothing if we go with your criteria
Texas... literally... just won the SEC last year LOL
Appreciate the self-own, buddy
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:55 pm to kbtigers85
Blueblood basically means "winningest programs in the pre-modern era."
Georgia and LSU aren't bluebloods because most of their success is recent. Most of Texas's success is in the 60s, smack in the middle of the era of when the sport was becoming a behemoth. When the lore was being written.
It doesn't mean we don't think Georgia and LSU aren't really good, important programs. They are, and we're really proud of you both.
Georgia and LSU aren't bluebloods because most of their success is recent. Most of Texas's success is in the 60s, smack in the middle of the era of when the sport was becoming a behemoth. When the lore was being written.
It doesn't mean we don't think Georgia and LSU aren't really good, important programs. They are, and we're really proud of you both.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 4:05 pm to kbtigers85
quote:
Do you also think Yale, Army, & Navy are blue bloods? Because the only way you can leave LSU & UGA out while keeping teams like Texas, Nebraska and even Michigan until the last couple years in is if you’re just using ancient success and wins in 1950 to come up with the list.
Google "Blue Blood College Football" or something like that..
Texas will show up on 80-90%+ of the list that are made on this topic..
LSU & Georgia will show up on about 10-15% of the list.. and almost all of those will also include Texas..
Yell at them if you don't like the results.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News