Started By
Message
re: Does Georgia have an argument for a split title?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 6:40 pm to Ingeniero
Posted on 12/30/23 at 6:40 pm to Ingeniero
Georgia was without their Starting ILB, they loss their Starting RT in the 1st half. Brock was at 70% at best and Ladd was trying to make a go of it with a body that was fighting compounding injuries.
The Playoff committee knew for a fact that Georgia would be an entirely different animal with 30 plus days to recover. And let’s be honest… a 3 peat would not have been a good thing for college football.
Remember, UGA basically had nothing left in the tank and loss to Bama by 3 points.
My GOD what a team Kirby has built
The Playoff committee knew for a fact that Georgia would be an entirely different animal with 30 plus days to recover. And let’s be honest… a 3 peat would not have been a good thing for college football.
Remember, UGA basically had nothing left in the tank and loss to Bama by 3 points.
My GOD what a team Kirby has built
4
Posted on 12/30/23 at 6:42 pm to DawgsCallingShots
Well said…
Posted on 12/30/23 at 6:43 pm to DawgsCallingShots
quote:
Nothing left in the tank
Really? Kind of like Bama in 2021. Injuries cost us.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 6:58 pm to DawgsCallingShots
quote:
Georgia was without their Starting ILB, they loss their Starting RT in the 1st half. Brock was at 70% at best and Ladd was trying to make a go of it with a body that was fighting compounding injuries.
The Playoff committee knew for a fact that Georgia would be an entirely different animal with 30 plus days to recover. And let’s be honest… a 3 peat would not have been a good thing for college football.
Only reason Georgia got the win over Bama three years ago because Bama had their best playmakers out. You got run out of the stadium.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:12 pm to DawgsCallingShots
quote:
DawgsCallingShots
We certainly know who you worship!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News