Started By
Message
re: If Clemson and FSU do indeed join the league
Posted on 9/28/23 at 2:27 pm to TheTideMustRoll
Posted on 9/28/23 at 2:27 pm to TheTideMustRoll
I doubt it!
I just don’t get why we won’t to save FSU and Clemson. I also don’t get why the Big10 would want them. GT and Miami line up better academically and have the major metro city location. Clemson and Tallahassee, don’t really line up.
I just don’t get why we won’t to save FSU and Clemson. I also don’t get why the Big10 would want them. GT and Miami line up better academically and have the major metro city location. Clemson and Tallahassee, don’t really line up.
4
Posted on 9/28/23 at 2:33 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
GT and Miami line up better academically
“We aren’t adding teams to play Skool.”
Both also have shitty fan bases in terms of turnout and loyalty
quote:
Clemson and Tallahassee, don’t really line up.
But the culture in and around campus fit and they pull more money for the conference
Throw in UNC and VT and you’re set.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 2:36 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
I just don’t get why we won’t to save FSU and Clemson.
So next go around we can make a playoff with just tSEC and B1G and keep all the money.
This post was edited on 9/28/23 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 9/28/23 at 2:39 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
have the major metro city location
If anything, I would argue that being in a major city is a detriment to the college football experience, all the way around.
Posted on 9/28/23 at 4:26 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Miami and GT can't get anybody to their games. Who wants anything from Metro Miami and Atlanta?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News