Started By
Message
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama?
Posted on 11/8/22 at 1:11 pm to LafTiger
Posted on 11/8/22 at 1:11 pm to LafTiger
quote:
The problem we have is the SEC has set precedent of what "possession" looks like, and it was NOT followed in this case.
No, the problem is Mond should have never been given credit for possession of the ball. All of these threads complaining about THIS call are really still just complaining about THAT call 4 years ago.
I mean I get the frustration, but you guys won.
This post was edited on 11/8/22 at 1:15 pm
2
Posted on 11/8/22 at 1:17 pm to Lonnie Utah
None of this possession talk addresses the critical question. It was called a fumble and recovery on the field. At that moment possession was established by the refs. Was there indisputable video evidence to overturn that initial call? Does anyone think there was?
Posted on 11/8/22 at 1:53 pm to Lonnie Utah
We agree...
EITHER: Mond was NOT down
OR: LSU has possession
The SEC office is the body that determined BOTH scenarios.
I don't care how it's interpreted...just do it consistently.
The SEC's only consistency about these two calls was that the interpretation both times benefited an LSU opponent.
It just makes for bad optics.
EITHER: Mond was NOT down
OR: LSU has possession
The SEC office is the body that determined BOTH scenarios.
I don't care how it's interpreted...just do it consistently.
The SEC's only consistency about these two calls was that the interpretation both times benefited an LSU opponent.
It just makes for bad optics.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News