Started By
Message

re: The 3rd Annual SECRant Worst Poster Tournament: Round of 64

Posted on 7/23/22 at 9:43 am to
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Literally never said that. In fact, I said the exact opposite of that, linked you to the post, and quoted it for you so you didn’t even have to click on it.


For the exact reasons you said they were undefeated in 2004 that would have been true in 2005. When I posted the quote , you just avoided answering the question. The next contest should be the poster who is the most FOS. You win hands down, even your fellow Cult members couldn't help you. LOL
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46827 posts
Posted on 7/23/22 at 11:15 am to
quote:

For the exact reasons you said they were undefeated in 2004 that would have been true in 2005.


You can’t be serious. They were undefeated in 2004 because they played 13 games, won all of them, and are credited by the NCAA with 11 wins and zero losses. Undefeated.

They were not undefeated in 2005 because they didn’t field a team per the NCAA. 0-0. They played zero games. Entire season voided.

Any other questions? You just want to keep making stuff up for fun?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter