Started By
Message
Swartz killing it with Cleveland
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:09 pm
sucked at au, what happened? TheFourHorsemen wants to know.
This post was edited on 12/25/21 at 6:10 pm
8
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:11 pm to BFANLC
Has it not been documented that AU recievers under Gus ran three routes? He's no longer the coach.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:12 pm to alpinetiger
How many nfl careers did Gus legitimately kill?
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:14 pm to BFANLC
quote:
sucked at au
Sucked? He was good, not great. But he was far from sucked.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:15 pm to jvilletiger25
quote:
Sucked? He was good, not great. But he was far from sucked.
Did you honestly think he'd have an nfl career? Cleveland at least knows how to use him.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:17 pm to BFANLC
quote:
Swartz
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:36 pm to BFANLC
Posted on 12/25/21 at 6:49 pm to BFANLC
quote:
Did you honestly think he'd have an nfl career?
Yes, because if his speed if nothing else. Not like his football coach did much to help him
Posted on 12/25/21 at 7:44 pm to Leto II
I didn't think he would make it but not a Swartz hater. Happy for anyone who makes it to the NFL. Could you imagine him though if he had a better qb and offense? At least double his career numbers.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 7:46 pm to BFANLC
quote:
At least double his career numbers.
Oh yeah. Still don’t get why receivers like him were signing with Gus still.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 7:48 pm to BFANLC
quote:
TheFourHorsemen
Forget to swap accounts?
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:03 pm to BFANLC
He, like other Auburn receivers, were drafted purely based on them being freaks of nature athletically.
Ricardo Louis
Sammie Coates
Darius Slayton
Anthony Schwartz
Seth Williams
Outside of SW above, all ran in the low 4.4 or high 4.3 range. They all had good verticals. They all had quickness. The problem they all also had, was that none of them knew how to run routes. Period. At all.
Ricardo Louis
Sammie Coates
Darius Slayton
Anthony Schwartz
Seth Williams
Outside of SW above, all ran in the low 4.4 or high 4.3 range. They all had good verticals. They all had quickness. The problem they all also had, was that none of them knew how to run routes. Period. At all.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:19 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
The problem they all also had, was that none of them knew how to run routes. Period. At all.
No development at the college level for sure. Swartz does look to have long term potential. Just from the couple games I've seen he is always making plays.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:28 pm to BFANLC
I still would've liked to have seen what he could've accomplished on the track had he not given it up to focus solely on football
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:45 pm to BFANLC
I wouldn’t say he’s killing it in Cleveland 
3 REC 69 yards and a TD tonight but before that his best game was Oct 21 where he had 2 REC for 22 yards
3 REC 69 yards and a TD tonight but before that his best game was Oct 21 where he had 2 REC for 22 yards
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:50 pm to BFANLC
Let’s be honest here:
He was playing at AU. At the collegiate level he didn’t have a chance to look anything but mediocre.
He was playing at AU. At the collegiate level he didn’t have a chance to look anything but mediocre.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:51 pm to jvilletiger25
Posted on 12/25/21 at 8:57 pm to Weagle25
quote:
3 REC 69 yards and a TD tonight but before that his best game was Oct 21 where he had 2 REC for 22 yards
Tonight was a good game. I've only seen a couple Browns games so the Oct 21st game was probably the other game I saw.
Posted on 12/25/21 at 9:08 pm to Weagle25
quote:
3 REC 69 yards and a TD tonight
I think you may have misread his game logs
He had 3 REC for 69 yards back in week 1 vs KC, but didn't have a TD that week
Tonight I'm seeing 1 REC for 5 yards and 1 TD, and 2 rushes for 24 yards
But he was their primary kick returner for a few weeks!
Posted on 12/25/21 at 9:09 pm to BowlJackson
Oh yeah you’re right
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News