re: New conference name needed

quote:

---

I have no clue what team you’re a fan of.

---

Sounds like a you problem.

Who has made more bowl money since 2012? Arky or Mizzou?

Soon to be NLIB conference for “No Longer in Birmingham”

quote:

---

Big 16 works. Cut the geographical bias. Plus the Deep South carries a ton of negative baggage

---

This is why nobody wants mizzou in the conference. Y’all where given the privilege of being allowed in but that was a mistake

Negative baggage is what your mom carried for 7-9 months. I am guessing you were born early retarded.

Arkansas brings much more to the SEC than Mizzou ever has. Try again.

I bet you’re a trashy Mizzou fan.

Let’s go to two divisions. The pre 90s 10 teams and the six newbies no one wanted.

quote:

---

Actually a decent point but is the sec really to blame? The story we were “told”……. is Texas and Ou approached the sec and said let us in or we are going to the big ten. Obviously laws dictate the sec can’t approach another conference member but it could still be true. Either way the sec or Texas initiated this round of expansion. The big is going to 24 teams and for those that say fine let ‘em just know when it’s time to negotiate playoff spots they will bully the sec and get more spots.

---

Let the Big10 grow.
Let them have all four time zones.
Let their xtra jumbo pizza feed 24 slices.
Let our jumbo pizza feed 16 slices.





Then in the future, let’s allpare back down to 6 or 7 leagues of 10/12 teams when we realize that expansion watered down the two best conferences.

Get the old SWC, big8 and big east back and we can have radial, regional rivalries.

Usc and ND can still have their rivalry.
Go look at the sec’s schedules back in the mid 80s. They were awesome
1 Aug 27, 1986 Wed (5) Alabama N (9) Ohio State
2 Sep 6, 1986 Sat (5) Alabama Vanderbilt
3 Sep 13, 1986 Sat (4) Alabama Southern Mississippi
4 Sep 20, 1986 Sat (4) Alabama @ (13) Florida
5 Oct 4, 1986 Sat (2) Alabama Notre Dame
6 Oct 11, 1986 Sat (2) Alabama Memphis
7 Oct 18, 1986 Sat (2) Alabama @ Tennessee
8 Oct 25, 1986 Sat (2) Alabama (6) Penn State
9 Nov 1, 1986 Sat (8) Alabama @ (19) Mississippi State
10 Nov 8, 1986 Sat (6) Alabama (18) LSU
11 Nov 15, 1986 Sat (11) Alabama Temple
12 Nov 29, 1986 Sat (7) Alabama N (14) Auburn
13 Dec 25, 1986 Thu (13) Alabama N (12) Washington

.

I said this round as in the latest. I guess you could go back to the gt to say the acc started it. But if you’re actually talking significance of where we are today 100 percent the sec started it. The addition of the conference championship game was a game changer

quote:

---

Actually a decent point but is the sec really to blame? The story we were “told”……. is Texas and Ou approached the sec and said let us in or we are going to the big ten. Obviously laws dictate the sec can’t approach another conference member but it could still be true. Either way the sec or Texas initiated this round of expansion. The big is going to 24 teams and for those that say fine let ‘em just know when it’s time to negotiate playoff spots they will bully the sec and get more spots.

---

That definitely sounds consistent with Texas behavior. And you idiots actually thought they would play nice with others

The “SEC” name and branding is bigger than any name in college athletics. There is no way it will change. It’s refreshing that there is no “BIG” or no “NUMBER” in the name.