Started By
Message

re: O’Neal legacy

Posted on 2/15/20 at 10:18 am to
Posted by Bige11
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2014
1514 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 10:18 am to
As much as I love Shaq, Wilt was far more dominant, bigger, stronger, and faster. Not even a conversation. Still Shaq is an all time great.
Posted by b rod lsu
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
4881 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 10:34 am to

Not to nitpick your post, but Wilt wasn’t bigger than Shaq.
Posted by msizzle08
Member since Dec 2019
650 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 10:45 am to
Wilt was more dominant to a bunch of 6'4 white guys.... Shaq is easily the most dominant big man ever. Horrible take on your part
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
12023 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Wilt was far more dominant, bigger, stronger, and faster. Not even a conversation.


I strongly disagree. He played at a time period where there were few seven footers. Most of his opposition was White. He could dominate any basketball contest on physical strength. Once Lew Alcindor came into the League, it was different. I watched Alcindor score fifty in their first playoff meeting.
When Shaq was at LSU, or even in high school, he could dribble the length of the court, and slam it.
Wilt was well coordinated but dominated because of his size and height over the opposing players.
Posted by TigahTeeth
Georgia
Member since Feb 2016
5190 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 11:25 am to
Dumb post. Shaq would have folded Wilt up like a lawn chair. Wilt wouldn’t have had a chance to stop Shaq. Ewing, Ming, Mutombo, Robinson, Olajuwon.... none of them could stop Shaq! Neither would Wilt.
This post was edited on 2/15/20 at 11:28 am
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278663 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

As much as I love Shaq, Wilt was far more dominant, bigger, stronger, and faster. Not even a conversation. Still Shaq is an all time great.



Check the rings
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10340 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

As much as I love Shaq, Wilt was far more dominant, bigger, stronger, and faster. Not even a conversation.


I would argue that simply because when Wilt played it was rare to have BIG men, he was one of the exceptions. Competition was not the same, of course a 7' 1" will dominate all others in the 6' 6" category.
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
3298 posts
Posted on 2/15/20 at 2:35 pm to
Wrong. Could you imagine what Shaq would have done to all the Eddie Haskell, 6-8 white dudes with tape on their glasses that wilt bowled over? Hell, Nate Thurmond was all world and 6-10 MAYBE??? wes freaking unseld is considered an all-time great at center, and was 6-6! Shaq woulda destroyed those boys worse than wilt ever did.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram