Started By
Message
re: SDS: Ranking every SEC coaching job in 2016
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:33 am to WG_Dawg
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:33 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Not sure about bama at #1....obviously they are primed and ready for the most immediate succes, but if we're using the quote above as our big factor, whateer coach comes in after Saban is gonna have it reeeeeal rough the first time he loses 2 games. I mean, if you go 3 seasons in a row without winning the SEC he'd probably be fired. Is that really desirable for a new guy?
Keep in mind I'm not bashing bama at all, I'm just using SDS's own quote to generate some discussion.
I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place. The ranking makes more sense when it is looked at that way.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:35 am to rockiee
I'm sorry, but I would consider Missouri last
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:36 am to rockiee
quote:
I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place.
In that case it's bama in a landslide.
But using their guideline that I quoted, I took all things into account. I guess you can't really quantify "pressure", but goodness if all 14 teams coaches died and had to be replaced, that next coach after saban would have an insane amount of "win big and win right now" pressure over their head.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:36 am to rockiee
quote:
I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place. The ranking makes more sense when it is looked at that way.
That doesn't make this ranking look any better....
Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:21 pm to rockiee
quote:
I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place. The ranking makes more sense when it is looked at that way.
I looked at it this way at first....but if this were the case I think Florida would be lower (For now) and LSU would be higher. Looks like they went by recruiting possibility, history, current talent, etc.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News