Started By
Message

re: SDS: Ranking every SEC coaching job in 2016

Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:33 am to
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Not sure about bama at #1....obviously they are primed and ready for the most immediate succes, but if we're using the quote above as our big factor, whateer coach comes in after Saban is gonna have it reeeeeal rough the first time he loses 2 games. I mean, if you go 3 seasons in a row without winning the SEC he'd probably be fired. Is that really desirable for a new guy?

Keep in mind I'm not bashing bama at all, I'm just using SDS's own quote to generate some discussion.


I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place. The ranking makes more sense when it is looked at that way.
Posted by Pinche Cabron
TN
Member since Nov 2015
3639 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:35 am to
I'm sorry, but I would consider Missouri last
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86585 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place.


In that case it's bama in a landslide.

But using their guideline that I quoted, I took all things into account. I guess you can't really quantify "pressure", but goodness if all 14 teams coaches died and had to be replaced, that next coach after saban would have an insane amount of "win big and win right now" pressure over their head.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44271 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place. The ranking makes more sense when it is looked at that way.


That doesn't make this ranking look any better....
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58977 posts
Posted on 3/14/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

I think they are mainly just looking at the talent that would be in place. The ranking makes more sense when it is looked at that way.


I looked at it this way at first....but if this were the case I think Florida would be lower (For now) and LSU would be higher. Looks like they went by recruiting possibility, history, current talent, etc.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter