I read it. You are kidding yourself if you don't think Texas A&M is positioned as well as anyone to compete with the conference big boys and win championships.

Also your post basically says nothing because because it is so full of hedge your bet comments such as:

quote:
The Aggies are currently setup to be anywhere as good as a national champion, and as bad as Mississippi State.

quote:
Am I saying they won't be able to do it? Absolutely not. Unlike the aforementioned Arkansas, A&M has a much bigger following, and natural recruiting draw. Heck, if Auburn can win a national championship, the Aggies sure can.

Then you go on to talk about universally applicable issues like can they replace players that left for the NFL, how long will Sumlin be there, etc.

Post was long and fairly well written, but it's content was pretty meh. Texas A&M is going to be a force to deal with just like the other conference big boys. They have shown they have the money and commitment to keep up. And they certainly will be able to get the players with some natural recruiting advantages.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by ATLabama

Member since Jan 2013

1602 posts

Posted on 6/18/13 at 1:28 pm to elposter

quote:
They have shown they have the money and commitment to keep up. And they certainly will be able to get the players with some natural recruiting advantages.

So does Texas. So does Florida. So does Notre Dame. So does USC.

Seriously, if you are going to measure future success based solely on recruiting, you're kidding yourself.

It takes WAY more than recruiting. If that's all i t was about, then we'd be talking about Mark Richt, coach of the century.

I said they would be a force.

Also, what is wrong with hedging your bet? I'm not placing bets, just analyzing.

Also, if you read the CONCLUSION I gave my prognostication.

Isn't that how you're supposed to give an opinion? List the pros and cons, dissect them, and then give an answer?

2 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board